Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment (suit commenced by plaint dated January 26, 2001)· [2023] KEELC 465 (KLR)

Buba v Saunyilila & another (Environment & Land Case 160 of 2001) [2023] KEELC 465 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court (court/registry not expressly named; Judge delivering at Nairobi)
2 February 2023
1,214 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court refused to revive a landowner's defence because he waited nearly four years, showing you cannot outsource your lawsuit to your lawyer.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by Lucy N. Mbugua, Judge, disposes of a notice of motion dated June 17, 2022 by the 2nd defendant seeking review and vacation of orders made on December 10, 2019, and leave to prosecute his defence and counterclaim. The litigation arose from a plaint dated January 26, 2001; judgment was entered against the 2nd defendant on March 17, 2004 after ex parte proceedings following service by newspaper advertisement. On November 12, 2018 the court conditionally set aside the judgment, requiring the 2nd defendant to file his defence and counterclaim within 15 days and pay throw-away costs of Kshs.50,000 within 60 days, failing which the orders would stand vacated. He defaulted; on December 10, 2019 the conditional orders were vacated and the plaintiff granted liberty to enforce the 2004 judgment. The applicant, blaming his previous advocates, Enonda & Associates, deponed that he had signed documents and paid Kshs.75,000 via M-pesa in November 2018, only discovering in June 2022 that the defence was never filed. The application was unopposed, but the court, citing Gideon Sitelu Konchellah v Sunkuli, examined the merits. It found the delay of almost four years inordinate, held that suits belong to litigants not advocates, and characterized the applicant as negligent and indolent. Invoking Article 159(2)(b) and the expeditious-justice principle, the court dismissed the application with no orders as to costs and closed the file.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether to set aside vacated conditional orders and permit the 2nd defendant to defend the suit

Holding

Application dismissed for inordinate delay and litigant indolence

Reasoning

The conditional orders of November 12, 2018 required filing of defence and payment of throw-away costs within 60 days; the applicant defaulted, orders were vacated on December 10, 2019, and he waited nearly four years to apply. Blaming former counsel does not excuse a litigant who failed to follow up his own case for years. Article 159(2)(b) on expeditious justice and the judiciary's case-backlog agenda weigh against exercising discretion in favour of such a litigant.

p. 2
02

Duty of court on unopposed applications

Holding

Court must examine merits even where application is unopposed

Reasoning

No response was filed, but per Gideon Sitelu Konchellah v Julius Lekakeny Ole Sunkuli, the court must nonetheless be satisfied the application is meritorious before granting prayers. The court therefore proceeded to assess the merits and found none.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An unopposed application is not automatically granted; the court must still satisfy itself on the merits
  • Suits belong to litigants, not their advocates, and litigants must diligently pursue their cases
  • Justice must be delivered expeditiously; delay violates litigants' rights

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated June 17, 2022 is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs
  3. 3.The file is marked as Closed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(b)

Cases cited (4)

  • Gideon Sitelu Konchellah v Julius Lekakeny Ole Sunkuli & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Teacher Service Commission v Ex-parte Patrick M Njuguna
    [2013] eKLR
  • Tana and Athi Rivers Development Authority vs. Jeremiah Kimigho Mwakio & 3 others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Mwangi Gachiengu & 2 Others –Vs- Mwaura Githuku & another
    [2019] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent power of the court to review/set aside its own orders; application under notice of motion dated June 17, 2022 (Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution cited on expeditious justice)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Buba v Saunyilila & another (Environment & Land Case 160 of 2001) [2023] KEELC 465 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in judgment (suit commenced by plaint dated January 26, 2001). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/465/eng@2023-02-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.