Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Caselaw
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherOriginating Summons dated November 29, 2021· [2023] KEELC 369 (KLR)

Jachong v Ogutu (Environment & Land Case E005 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 369 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
18 January 2023
GOG M A Ong'ondo
259 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A landowner's adverse possession claim over a Homa-Bay plot ended quietly when he withdrew his own suit, with costs left for the parties to settle between themselves.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, Syprian Njiri Jachong, had filed an originating summons on November 29, 2021 in the Environment and Land Court at Homa-Bay, claiming to have acquired title by adverse possession over the whole of Kamder Adjudication Section Plot No. 3437 in Homa-Bay County. By a notice of withdrawal of suit dated January 17, 2023, filed through the firm of Quinter Adoyo and Company Advocates, the plaintiff sought to withdraw the suit entirely and indicated that he was amenable to a discussion between the advocates on the issue of costs. Counsel for the defendant, Ms Odhiambo of G S Okoth and Company Advocates, raised no objection to the withdrawal and indicated willingness to agree on costs given sufficient time. Having perused the notice of withdrawal and heard both counsel, G M A Ong'ondo J allowed the notice of withdrawal. The court directed that the parties agree on the issue of costs of the suit and fixed the matter for further directions as regards costs on February 21, 2023. No costs order was made by the court itself; costs were left for agreement between the parties. The suit was accordingly withdrawn before trial, and no determination was made on the underlying adverse possession claim.

Key legal issues

#
01

Withdrawal of suit by notice

Holding

The court allowed the plaintiff's notice withdrawing the suit entirely, the defendant having raised no objection

Reasoning

The plaintiff filed a notice of withdrawal dated January 17, 2023 seeking to withdraw the suit entirely and indicating amenability to discussing costs. Defendant's counsel responded with no objection and an openness to agreeing costs. After perusing the notice and hearing both counsel, the court allowed the withdrawal and left costs for agreement between the parties.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A plaintiff may withdraw a suit by notice, and where the defendant raises no objection, the court may allow the withdrawal and leave costs to be agreed between the parties

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of withdrawal of suit dated January 17, 2023 is allowed
  2. 2.The parties to agree on the issue of costs of the suit
  3. 3.Further directions as regards costs on February 21, 2023
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over a claim for title by adverse possession

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jachong v Ogutu (Environment & Land Case E005 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 369 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Originating Summons dated November 29, 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/369/eng@2023-01-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.