Regina Mugure & another v Stephen Mwenda M'Marete & 4 others
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court blocked the sale of disputed land pending appeal, but only after the appellants deposited Kshs. 1 million as security.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether there was unreasonable delay in filing the application for stay
There was no delay; the application filed on 16th September 2022 followed a judgment delivered on 5th September 2022
The court applied the first criterion under Order 42 Rule 6, comparing the date of the trial judgment (5th September 2022) with the filing date of the application (16th September 2022), an interval of eleven days, and found that the application was brought without unreasonable delay, satisfying that limb of the test.
Whether the applicants demonstrated substantial loss
Eviction and sale of the suit land would render the appeal nugatory and cause substantial loss
The applicants deposed that failure to grant stay would expose them to eviction and expose the suit property to sale by the 1st and 3rd respondents. Applying Silverstein v Chesoni, the court held that if the applicants were evicted and the land sold, the appeal would be rendered nugatory and the applicants would suffer substantial loss, satisfying the second criterion.
Whether security for the due performance of the decree was required
The court conditioned the stay on the deposit of Kshs. 1,000,000 as security within thirty days, failing which the stay lapses
Although the applicants had not addressed security, the court held it has power to order security. Considering the facts, it directed deposit of Kshs. 1,000,000 into an interest-earning account in the joint names of the advocates, within thirty days, with automatic lapse of the stay orders upon default, balancing the appellants' right of appeal against the successful litigant's right to the fruits of the judgment.
Whether proceedings in Meru CM ELC No. 5 of 2019 should be stayed
Stay of proceedings declined as the applicants did not meet the test
The court characterized stay of proceedings as a grave judicial action that impedes access to justice and fair trial rights, grantable sparingly and exceptionally. It was not satisfied that proper reasons existed, noting the order would further delay proceedings in the subordinate court, and therefore declined the prayer for stay of proceedings.
Legal principles established
#- An applicant for stay of execution pending appeal must demonstrate substantial loss, that the application was made without undue delay, and must furnish security for the due performance of the decree
- Stay of proceedings is a grave judicial action to be granted sparingly and only in exceptional cases
Court orders
#- 1.That the 2nd and 3rd respondents are barred from selling, advertising for sale or in any other manner interfering with the parcels of land known as Ngusishi Settlement Scheme/1218 and Ngusishi Settlement Scheme/1219 pending hearing and determination of the applicant's appeal
- 2.That the applicants/appellants shall furnish security of Kshs. 1,000,000/= for performance of the decree in Meru CMC ELC No. 031/032 of 2020, to be deposited in an interest earning account in the joint names of the appellants and the advocates for the 2nd and 3rd respondents within thirty (30) days
- 3.That in the event of failure to comply with the security order, the order restraining sale shall stand vacated
- On appeal from
- Chief Magistrate's Court (Environment and Land), Meru
- Meru CMC ELC No. 032 of 2020 (also referenced as Meru MCELC No. 5 of 2019 relating to the same subject matter)
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles 159(2)(d) and 162(2)(b) of the Constitution; Sections 3, 11, 13, 18 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act No. 19 of 2011; Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules; Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Regina Mugure & another v Stephen Mwenda M'Marete & 4 others", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the extract (application dated 16th September, 2022 arising from Meru CMC ELC No. 032 of 2020). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/56/eng@2023-01-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.