Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment & Land Case 1308 of 2014· [2022] KEELC 14731 (KLR)

Ngatiari v Njue & another

Environment and Land Court
10 November 2022
1,613 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to help a land buyer force a fingerprint investigation, ruling that parties must gather their own evidence before trial.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi (E. K. Wabwoto, J) determines a notice of motion dated 1st March 2022 by the plaintiff, Joel Ngatiari, in a land suit against Madris Kere Njue and Joseph Gitau. The plaintiff, who claimed to have purchased the suit property from the 1st defendant, sought orders directing the Director of Criminal Investigations to examine the 1st defendant's fingerprints and compare them with fingerprints on documents exhibited in his supporting affidavit, including documents from P&A Cause 179 of 1987 (Estate of Joshua Njue Murere), an assent, and pleadings in this suit. He also sought leave to join Isabel Wakarima Nganga and the Chief Land Registrar as parties and leave to amend the plaint. The respondents opposed through grounds of opposition, contending bad faith, infringement of the 1st respondent's rights, contravention of natural justice, inordinate delay after eight years, and fishing for evidence, citing Wareham and M'Bito Ntiro. The court framed two issues: joinder of the proposed parties, and the orders for expert aid and evidence. On joinder, applying Order 1 rule 10(2) and Meme v Republic as elaborated in Shirvling Supermarket, the court found no cogent reasons necessitating the joinder. On the fingerprint orders, the court held that under the adversarial system a party must avail all evidence before trial under Order 3 rule 2, that the application sought to procure evidence to the plaintiff's advantage, and that the court, as an impartial umpire, cannot direct the DCI to conduct investigations for a party. The application was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Joinder of Isabel Wakarima Nganga and the Chief Land Registrar

Holding

Joinder refused; the plaintiff failed to demonstrate any cogent reason or stake necessitating their joinder.

Reasoning

Applying Order 1 rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and Meme v Republic, the court held that a proposed party's presence must be necessary to enable the court effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all questions in the suit. Reviewing the supporting affidavit and submissions, the court found no cogent reasons for joining the two proposed parties; the plaintiff made no case for their joinder.

02

Orders for fingerprint examination by the DCI (expert aid and evidence)

Holding

Refused; the court cannot assist a party to procure evidence, and no proper basis was laid for directing the DCI.

Reasoning

Under the adversarial system, a party must avail all relevant material and evidence before trial, as required by Order 3 rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The application, filed eight years after the suit, sought to procure more evidence to the plaintiff's advantage and to the respondent's prejudice. The court's only role is issuing summons to witnesses; compelling investigative reports would compromise its impartiality.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A court cannot direct investigative bodies to procure evidence for a party in a civil suit; parties must avail their evidence before trial under an adversarial system
  • Joinder requires demonstration of an identifiable interest or that the party is necessary for complete adjudication

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 1st March 2022 is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 rule 10(2)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 3 rule 2
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 4 rule 1(2)

Cases cited (4)

  • Meme v Republic
    [2004] 1 KLR 124

    Principles for joinder of parties

  • Shirvling Supermarket Limited v Jimmy Ondicho Nyabuti & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR

    Test for joinder: identifiable interest or necessary party for complete adjudication

  • Anthony Francis Wareham T/A Wareham & 2 others v Kenya Ports Office Savings Bank Ltd
    [2004] eKLR

    Relied on by respondents in opposition to the application

  • M'Bito Ntiro v Mbae Mwirichia & Another
    [2018] eKLR

    Relied on by respondents in opposition to the application

Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over a land dispute (interlocutory application in a suit filed 8th October 2014)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ngatiari v Njue & another", Case Analysis (2022). Environment & Land Case 1308 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/14731/eng@2022-11-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.