Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutEnvironment & Land Case E183 of 2022· [2022] KEELC 14461 (KLR)

Karen Ngong View Estate Association v Odeck & 7 others

Environment and Land Court
27 October 2022
3,683 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Karen residents' association lost its construction dispute because it went to court before using the statutory planning appeal process.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff association moved the Environment and Land Court by notice of motion dated May 24, 2022 seeking a conservatory injunction restraining the 1st defendant from further construction on Plot No 12882/109 Ngong Road, Karen, and a mandatory injunction to pull down an allegedly illegal fence and gate facing Ngong Road. The plaintiff alleged the 1st defendant, a member of the association, had deviated from a renovation and repair permit granted by Nairobi Metropolitan Services and commenced unauthorised excavations, demolitions and construction of a public entertainment joint, exposing residents to insecurity. A later application dated September 23, 2022 sought to restrain operation of a hotel, car wash and barbershop and leave to amend pleadings. The 1st defendant raised a preliminary objection that the court lacked jurisdiction because the plaintiff had not exhausted the appeal mechanism in sections 61(3) and 78(b) of the Physical and Land Use Planning Act, and filed replying affidavits asserting he held valid permits including change of user to a restaurant approved by the County Planning Committee and KURA access approval. The National Construction Authority disclosed it had suspended the project for non-compliance. The court framed three issues and held that the dispute concerned land use and development within the province of the county physical and land use planning liaison committees, applying the doctrine of exhaustion of remedies as articulated in Karume, Kibos, Eaton Towers, Hulbhai Gedi Abdille and Munene. It found the plaintiff had not explored statutory complaint mechanisms, including under EMCA. The preliminary objection was allowed, the suit and both applications were struck out for want of jurisdiction, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Applicability of the doctrine of exhaustion of remedies

Holding

The preliminary objection succeeds; the plaintiff should have pursued the appeal mechanism under sections 61(3) and 78(b) of the Physical and Land Use Planning Act before filing suit.

Reasoning

The court found the crux of the dispute concerned construction, change of user and an access road, i.e. land use/development under the Physical and Land Use Planning Act. Section 61(3) provides an appeal mechanism to the county liaison committee for aggrieved persons, including interested parties, and section 78(b) gives that committee jurisdiction to hear such appeals. Relying on Karume, Kibos, Eaton Towers and Hulbhai Gedi Abdille, the court held judicial restraint required the plaintiff to use those forums first.

02

Whether the injunctions sought were merited

Holding

Not determined on the merits; the applications were struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Reasoning

Having upheld the preliminary objection on exhaustion, the court did not reach the Giella v Cassman Brown test. It noted the plaintiff's complaint mechanisms under EMCA had also not been explored, and that the NCA suspension notice postdated the suit and had not been prosecuted under section 23(3)A.

p. 7
03

Whether leave to amend pleadings should be granted

Holding

Not granted; the application of September 23, 2022 was struck out with the suit.

Reasoning

The application seeking leave to amend and interim restraints against the hotel, car wash and barbershop fell with the suit once the preliminary objection on jurisdiction was upheld.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a statute prescribes a mechanism for redress of a grievance, that mechanism must be exhausted before resorting to the court
  • Disputes over development permissions and land use fall within the province of the county physical and land use planning liaison committees

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 1st defendant's preliminary objection dated July 20, 2022 is allowed.
  2. 2.The suit and the plaintiff's applications dated May 24, 2022 and September 23, 2022 are struck out for want of jurisdiction.
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs of the suit.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Articles 10, 22, 23, 42, 43, 47, 69, 70
  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination ActSection 3; second schedule (as amended by Legal Notice No 31 of April 30, 2019)
  • Physical and Land Use Planning ActSections 61(3), 72(1) and (2), 78(a) and (b)
  • Societies ActSections 4, 9
  • National Construction Authority ActSections 23(3)(c), 23(5), 23(3)A, 25
  • National Construction Authority Regulations 2014Registration of construction projects

Cases cited (9)

  • Mukhisa Biscuit Manufacturers Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    [1969] EA 696

    Threshold for a valid preliminary objection

  • Giella v Cassman Brown
    (1973) EA 358

    Requirements for grant of interlocutory injunctions

  • Kenya Electricity Transmission Company Limited v Kibotu Limited
    [2019] eKLR

    Adoption of the Giella injunction principles

  • Angela Mbugua & 4 Others v KO Holdings Limited & 2 others
    [2020] eKLR

    Preliminary objection on jurisdiction is a pure point of law

  • The Speaker of the National Assembly v James Njenga Karume
    [1992] eKLR

    Where a clear statutory procedure for redress exists, it must be strictly followed

  • Eaton Towers Kenya Limited v Kasing'a & 5 others
    (Civil Appeal No 49 of 2016) (2022) 861 (KLR) (28 April 2022)

    First port of call is suitable statutory forums; multifaceted petitions do not confer jurisdiction

  • Kibos Distillers Limited & 4 others v Benson Ambuti Adega & 3 others
    (2020) eKLR

    Judicial abstention/restraint where other legislatively mandated mechanisms exist

  • Secretary, County Public Service Board & another v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille
    [2017] eKLR

    A party ought to pursue other sufficient and adequate dispute forums before invoking the court process

  • James Mungai Munene (Chairman) & another v Joseph Githinji Kamau & 3 others
    [2022] eKLR

    County Physical and Land Use Planning Liaison Committee is the primary forum for development permission disputes

Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 10, 22, 23, 42, 43, 47, 69 and 70 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010; section 3 of the Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act of 1999

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Karen Ngong View Estate Association v Odeck & 7 others", Case Analysis (2022). Environment & Land Case E183 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/14461/eng@2022-10-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.