Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedEnvironment and Land Miscellaneous Application E024 of 2022· [2022] KEELC 13387 (KLR)

In re AGN & SMN (Minors)

Environment and Land Court
4 October 2022
1,430 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court allowed trustees to sell land held for minors to pay school fees, provided the balance is invested for their education.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By originating summons under Order 37 rule 1(f) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, the two applicants - mother and daughter - sought vesting orders to sell land parcel Gaturi/Weru/7770, registered in the names of the first applicant and the subject minors, to pay school fees of Kshs 196,910, meet valuation and transfer costs, and invest the balance in a call account for the minors' education. The applicants relied on Sections 13 and 56 of the Trustees Act, Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 4(1) of the Children's Act, and cited In Re Eunice Wanjeri Njenga (ELC Misc. Civil Suit No. 62 of 2013) as broadly similar authority. Kaniaru J held the first applicant holds the suit property in trust for the second applicant and the minors, found the applicants were acting in the minors' best interests, and held the proposed use of proceeds sound and prudent. The court granted prayer 1 in full (vesting orders to sell, with proceeds applied to valuation costs, transfer costs, school fees and investment of the balance), directed service of the extracted order where required by offices involved in the sale and change of ownership, and made no order as to costs. Judgment dated, signed and delivered in open court at Embu on 4 October 2022.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a trustee holding registered land in trust for minors may be authorised to sell it for their education

Holding

Yes; the court granted vesting orders where the sale and application of proceeds were expedient and in the minors' best interests

Reasoning

The first applicant purchased the suit property and holds it in trust for the second applicant and the minors, some of whom appear on the title. Section 13 of the Trustees Act vests a power of sale in a trustee, while Section 56 permits the court to confer powers absent from the trust instrument where expeditious. The proposed application of proceeds - fees, costs, and investment of the balance - was found sound and prudent and consistent with the minors' best interests.

p. 3
02

Whether the applicants acted in the best interests of the minors

Holding

Yes

Reasoning

The court found the applicants were acting in the minors' best interests as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 4(1) of the Children's Act, noting the school fees requirement of Kshs 196,910 and the security afforded by other properties registered in the minors' names.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Under Section 13 of the Trustees Act a trustee in whom a power of sale is vested may sell all or part of the trust property
  • Under Section 56 of the Trustees Act the court may confer on trustees a power of disposition which the trust instrument or law does not provide, where expedient in the administration of trust property

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Vesting orders granted to sell property known as Gaturi/Weru/7770, proceeds to be applied to valuation costs, transfer costs, payment of the minors' school fees, and the balance invested in a call account for the minors' education
  2. 2.The decree or order extracted after delivery of the judgment be served if and when required by any of the offices involved in the sale and change of ownership
  3. 3.No order as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Trustees Act (Cap 167)Sections 13, 17, 56
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21)Section 3A
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 37 rule 1(f)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 53(2)
  • Children's ActSection 4(1)

Cases cited (1)

  • In Re Eunice Wanjeri Njenga
    ELC Misc. Civil Suit No. 62 of 2013 [2013] eKLR

    Broadly similar matter invoking the same Trustees Act provisions; cited as persuasive precedent

Jurisdiction invoked
Order 37 rule 1(f) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010; Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21); Sections 13 and 56 of the Trustees Act (Cap 167)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "In re AGN & SMN (Minors)", Case Analysis (2022). Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E024 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/13387/eng@2022-10-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.