Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedLand Case 65 of 2018· [2022] KEELC 13287 (KLR)

Kaburu (Suing as the Guardian ad-Litem and heir of the estate of the late Isaiah Mabellini) v Mabellini & 3 others

Environment and Land Court at Malindi
5 October 2022
1,864 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court granted a party a second chance to appeal, but refused to rescue an appeal notice filed without the required permission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Malindi (M.A. Odeny, J) determined a Notice of Motion dated 24th February 2022 by the 1st Defendant seeking leave to appeal a ruling delivered virtually by Hon. J O Olola on 10th February 2022, and an order deeming his Notice of Appeal dated 18th February 2022 as properly on record. The Applicant explained that the ruling had been reserved for delivery on 11th November 2021 but was instead delivered virtually on 10th February 2022, of which he only learned on 18th February 2022, and relied on Covid-19 practice directions on notification of delivery dates, together with authorities on the fatal consequence of failing to obtain leave. The Plaintiff opposed, showing that notice of the delivery was posted on the court notice board and on the Malindi court Telegram forum. The court held that under Order 43(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, leave to appeal is mandatory where an order is appealable only with leave, and that a Notice of Appeal filed without leave cannot be sanitized. The complaint of insufficient notice was rejected: courts have embraced technology, and counsel are notified through cause lists, notice boards, WhatsApp, emails, Telegram and the registry. Nonetheless, in the interest of justice and on the strength of the Applicant's right of access to justice under Article 48, the court granted leave to appeal, with 14 days to file a Notice of Appeal failing which the leave lapses. The request to deem the already-filed Notice of Appeal as properly on record was refused. Costs were ordered to abide the outcome of the intended appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicant showed sufficient grounds for leave to appeal out of the statutory 14-day window

Holding

Leave to appeal was granted in the interest of justice, but the claim of insufficient notice of virtual delivery was rejected.

Reasoning

The court found that the ruling had been reserved for delivery on notice and that proper notices were given through the court's usual channels. Counsel's complaints about lack of physical presence in Malindi and lack of notice were untenable given the multiple notification forums available since the advent of Covid-19. However, discretion could still be exercised in the interest of justice to grant fresh leave with a new 14-day window.

p. 4
02

Whether a Notice of Appeal filed without leave can be deemed properly on record

Holding

No; such a Notice of Appeal cannot be sanitized and is ineffective.

Reasoning

Relying on Moffat Nyaga Kagau v Patrick Opundo Owiti and Peter Nyaga Murake v Joseph Mutunga, the court held that where leave to appeal is a prerequisite, the procurement of leave is sine qua non to the lodging of a Notice of Appeal. Without leave there can be no valid Notice of Appeal and no properly invoked appellate jurisdiction. The applicant's filed Notice of Appeal therefore could not be deemed properly filed.

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal from an order appealable only with leave cannot be lodged without first obtaining leave; failure to seek and obtain leave is fatal.
  • Parties and counsel are on notice of delivery of judgments and rulings through various court notification forums including cause lists, notice boards, emails and court Telegram channels.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to the Applicant to appeal the ruling delivered on 10th February 2022
  2. 2.Applicant granted 14 days to file a Notice of Appeal, failing which the leave lapses
  3. 3.Costs to abide the outcome of the intended appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 43 rules (1), (2), (3) and (4)
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 75
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 [1]

Cases cited (6)

  • Nyutu Agrovet vs Airtel Networks Ltd
    [2015] eKLR

    Where leave to appeal is a prerequisite, failure to seek and obtain leave is fatal.

  • Serephen Nyasani Menge v Rispah Onsase
    [2018] eKLR

    Leave must be sought from the court making the order, orally or within 14 days; the requirement is mandatory.

  • James Wangalwa and another v Agnes Naliaka Cheseto
    [2012] eKLR

    Right of appeal under Article 48 guaranteeing access to justice.

  • Margaret Njamio Mbauini (Suing as Legal Representative of Catherine Nyaguthii Mbauini) v District Surveyor, Nyeri & 2 others; Gregory Maina Mbauni (Interested Party)
    [2020] eKLR

    Applicant had not established prima facie case to warrant leave to appeal.

  • Moffat Nyaga Kagau & 3 others v Patrick Opundo Owiti t/a Cousin Motor Works & 2 others
    [2021] eKLR

    Court struck out an appeal filed without leave of the court.

  • Peter Nyaga Murake v Joseph Mutunga
    CA Nairobi 86 of 2015

    Leave to appeal is sine qua non to lodging a Notice of Appeal; without it the appeal is dead in the water.

Jurisdiction invoked
Order 43 rules (1), (2), (3) and (4) of the Civil Procedure Rules; section 75 of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kaburu (Suing as the Guardian ad-Litem and heir of the estate of the late Isaiah Mabellini) v Mabellini & 3 others", Case Analysis (2022). Land Case 65 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/13287/eng@2022-10-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.