Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedEnvironment & Land Case 29 of 2015· [2022] KEELC 12829 (KLR)

Wekesa v Nato & 10 others

Environment and Land Court
30 September 2022
1,270 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court can sign land transfer documents for you if you refuse to sign them after losing a case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Bungoma (BN Olao, J) disposed of a notice of motion dated November 29, 2021 by the 1st defendant, Joseph Namasaka Nato, following the court's judgment of June 26, 2020 which dismissed the plaintiff's suit, cancelled the title to parcel Bungoma/Kabisi/323 issued in the plaintiff's name, and directed issuance of a new title to the 1st defendant in trust for himself and his siblings, with costs to the plaintiff. The plaintiff refused to execute transfer documents, prompting the 1st defendant to apply under sections 3, 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act for orders authorising the deputy registrar to execute the transfer of land forms, Land Control Board consent application and related documentation. The application was served on the plaintiff's counsel on February 4, 2022 but was unopposed; neither party complied with the court's directions on filing submissions, the defendants filing late and the plaintiff not at all. The court invoked section 1A(3) on compliance with directions, section 3A inherent powers, and section 98, which permits the court to nominate a person to execute a conveyance where the party directed refuses to do so. Allowing the application, the court ordered the plaintiff (referred to as Eliud Sahenyi) to execute the documents within 14 days of service, failing which the deputy registrar would do so on his behalf, with no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the deputy registrar may execute transfer documents on behalf of a judgment-debtor who refuses to comply with a decree

Holding

Yes; under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act the court may order execution by a nominated person, here the deputy registrar, in default of the plaintiff's compliance

Reasoning

The plaintiff refused to execute transfer documents despite a judgment in favour of the defendants that was not appealed. Section 98 empowers the court to nominate a person to execute the conveyance, and Section 3A donates inherent powers to make orders necessary for the ends of justice. Without the orders the judgment would remain hollow and the defendants denied justice.

02

Consequences of parties' failure to comply with court directions on filing pleadings and submissions

Holding

Parties who fail to file pleadings and documents in time risk orders being issued against them without their input

Reasoning

Both parties failed to comply with the court's directions of March 8, 2022: the defendants filed submissions late and the plaintiff filed none despite service. Section 1A(3) of the Civil Procedure Act enjoins parties and advocates to assist the court to further the overriding objective by complying with directions and orders.

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a party neglects or refuses to execute a conveyance required by a decree, the court may nominate a person to execute it, and the document so executed operates as if executed by the party originally directed
  • A court must make appropriate orders to ensure a judgment-holder enjoys the benefits of a judgment that has not been appealed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Eliud Sahenyi plaintiff herein shall within 14 days of service upon him of this ruling execute the transfer of land forms, application for consent of the Land Control Board and all other relevant documents to facilitate the transfer of the land parcel No Bungoma/Kabisi/323 in the name of Joseph Namasaka Nato to hold in trust for himself and his siblings
  2. 2.In default of (1) above, the deputy registrar shall be at liberty to do so on behalf of the said Eliud Sahenyi
  3. 3.No orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 3, 3A and 63(e)
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1A(3)
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 98
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3, 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act; Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Wekesa v Nato & 10 others", Case Analysis (2022). Environment & Land Case 29 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/12829/eng@2022-09-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.