Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedEnviromental and Land Originating Summons E001 of 2021· [2022] KEELC 4853 (KLR)

Hathinge Self Help Group (with a membership of 293 members and suing through the registered officials) & 3 others v Co-operative Bank Housing Cooperative Society Ltd

Environment and Land Court
21 September 2022
2,888 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Machakos court cancelled a land settlement made by a lawyer who had no instructions from the 293-member group he claimed to represent.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by A. Nyukuri, J of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos on a Notice of Motion dated November 25, 2021 by the Plaintiffs, seeking orders that the firm of Swan Advocates furnish written instructions and that the court set aside consent orders dated November 5, 2021 and the subsequent decree of November 16, 2021. The Plaintiffs, a self help group of 293 members acting through officials, contended that their advocates were Kalwa & Co. Advocates and that Swan Advocates filed a Notice of Change of Advocates and recorded a consent declaring them trespassers without any instructions. Harrison Mutunga Wambua, the third plaintiff official, opposed, alleging the suit was founded on forgery of his signature and that he instructed Swan Advocates to compromise the matter. The Defendant also opposed, arguing the Plaintiffs compromised voluntarily and that conditions for setting aside a consent order were unmet. The court framed a sole issue: whether the Plaintiffs met the threshold for setting aside the consent order. Applying Intercountries Importers, Flora N. Wasike and Omulele & Tollo, the court held that a retainer may be implied from conduct but requires evidence; none was furnished by Swan Advocates. Since the group is distinct from Wambua, his personal instructions could not bind it. The court found the consent was procured by fraud and collusion and set aside the consent orders and decree, with costs to the Plaintiffs/Applicants.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the firm of Swan Advocates had a retainer/instructions from the Plaintiffs to record the consent

Holding

No retainer or instructions existed; the firm acted without authority from the Plaintiffs

Reasoning

The court applied the definition of retainer from Black's Law Dictionary and Omulele & Tollo, holding a retainer may be implied from conduct but requires evidence. Swan Advocates filed no evidence of written instructions or conduct-based retainer. The self help group, with 293 members, is distinct from Harrison Mutunga Wambua, whose personal instructions could not bind the group.

p. 5
02

Whether the consent dated November 5, 2021 was procured by fraud and collusion

Holding

Yes; the consent was procured by fraud and collusion and was set aside

Reasoning

Harrison Mutunga Wambua admitted he did not file the suit and alleged his signature was forged, yet instructed Swan Advocates to compromise it. A stranger to a suit cannot compromise a suit affecting over 200 members of a self help group. This demonstrated collusion between Wambua, Swan Advocates and the Defendant.

Legal principles established

#
  • A consent order will only be set aside if procured through fraud, non-disclosure of material facts, mistake or a reason which would enable a court to set it aside
  • A retainer need not be written; it may be oral or inferred from conduct, but where a client contradicts the advocate's claim of retainer and no evidence exists, the advocate is treated as acting without authority
  • Consents entered by counsel bind clients unless fraud, collusion, absence of consensus, public policy or other grounds for setting aside are shown

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The consent orders dated November 5, 2021 and the subsequent decree dated November 16, 2021 be and are hereby set aside
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the Plaintiffs/Applicants
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent powers of the Environment and Land Court to set aside consent orders in a suit before it (Environment and Land Court Act; Civil Procedure Act framework)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Hathinge Self Help Group (with a membership of 293 members and suing through the registered officials) & 3 others v Co-operative Bank Housing Cooperative Society Ltd", Case Analysis (2022). Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E001 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/4853/eng@2022-09-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.