Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedEnvironment & Land Case 200 of 2012· [2022] KEELC 4778 (KLR)

Ali & 2 others v Boit & another

Environment and Land Court
21 September 2022
4,150 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court dismissed a late bid to reopen taxed legal costs and allowed eviction and property attachment to enforce a 2014 land judgment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Eldoret (S. M. Kibunja, J) determined two applications arising from a long-running land dispute over parcel Uasin Gishu/Sosiani/28, in which judgment was entered for the plaintiffs on July 31, 2014 ordering the defendants to vacate. First, the defendants' notice of motion dated June 7, 2021 sought reopening of the bill of costs taxed on February 17, 2015 at Kshs 901,600, claiming they were condemned unheard. The plaintiffs opposed, arguing res judicata and functus officio. The court held that rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order 2009 mandatorily requires an aggrieved party to lodge a notice of objection within 14 days and then a reference; the defendants had done neither, nor sought extension of time, and their application was dismissed with costs. Second, the plaintiffs' notice of motion dated January 21, 2022 sought eviction of James C Boit, police security for bailiffs, and attachment and auction of Uasin Gishu/Sosiani/25 to satisfy taxed costs. The court noted the defendants' appeal (Eldoret CACA No 50 of 2015) had been dismissed on December 3, 2021, lifting the stay, and that although the court was functus officio on the final judgment, it retained jurisdiction over execution. The application was allowed as prayed with costs. The court flagged but did not reconcile discrepancies in dates and costs figures.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the bill of costs could be reopened for fresh taxation

Holding

No - the defendants bypassed the mandatory objection procedure under rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order 2009 and did not seek extension of time

Reasoning

Rule 11 requires an aggrieved party to lodge a notice of objection within 14 days of taxation and then a reference to a judge. The defendants, aggrieved by the taxation of February 17, 2015, instead filed a motion in 2021 seeking reopening. The court held the lodgement of a notice of objection is peremptory and mandatory, and since no extension of time was sought, the application was a half-hearted attempt in disregard of the law and was dismissed.

p. 4
02

Whether eviction and execution orders should issue against the 2nd defendant

Holding

Yes - the appeal having been dismissed, the 2015 eviction orders were no longer stayed and the application for execution was allowed as prayed

Reasoning

The court noted eviction orders had been granted on October 23, 2015 and the Court of Appeal's conditional stay lapsed upon dismissal of the appeal on December 3, 2021. Though functus officio on the final judgment, the court retains jurisdiction over execution. The defendant did not oppose eviction but sought six months, which the court did not address in its final orders; the application was allowed as prayed with costs.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • A party aggrieved by a taxing officer's decision must lodge a notice of objection within 14 days and thereafter a reference; the court cannot reopen taxation in disregard of rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order
  • A court that has rendered a final decision is functus officio but retains responsibility to deal with execution proceedings as moved by the parties
  • Dismissal of an appeal by the Court of Appeal lifts any stay, reviving eviction orders previously granted by the trial court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The defendants' notice of motion dated June 7, 2021 is dismissed with costs
  2. 2.The plaintiffs' notice of motion dated January 21, 2022 is allowed as prayed with costs, including eviction of James C Boit from land parcel No Uasin Gishu/Sosiani/28, security by the OCS Juakali Police Station for court bailiffs, and attachment and auction of Uasin Gishu/Sosiani/25 to satisfy the taxed costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 50(1)
  • Advocates Remuneration Order 2009Rule 11

Cases cited (12)

  • Patriotic Guards Limited v James Kipchirchir Sambu
    (2018) eKLR

    Counsel's failure to attend should not be visited upon litigants

  • Osborn v Bank of the United States, 22 U S 738 [1824]
    22 U S 738

    Judicial discretion is legal discretion to be exercised in discerning the course prescribed by law

  • K Praksh v B R Sampath Kumar
    Civil Appeal No 9047 of 2014

    Discretion is governed by rules of law and equity, not arbitrariness (quoting Rookey's Case)

  • Rookey's Case
    [77 ER 209; (1597) 5 Co.Rep.99]

    Discretion must be governed by rules of law and equity

  • Richard Nchapai Leiyangan v IEBC & 2 others

    Discretion to set aside ex parte orders is not to assist one who deliberately obstructs or delays justice

  • Philip Chemwolo & Another v Augustine Kubende
    (1982-1988) KAR 103 at 1040

    Equity in excusing default does not apply where there is intention to overreach

  • Dennis K Magare & Ben Musundi T/a Magare Musundi & Co Advocates v Parminder Singh Manku & another
    [2021] eKLR

    Lodgement of notice of objection to taxation is peremptory, mandatory and imperative

  • Gideon Sitelu Konchellah v Julius Lekakeny Ole Sunkuli & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR

    Court must satisfy itself an unopposed application is meritorious before granting orders

  • Raila Odinga & 2 others v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 3 others
    [2013] eKLR

    Functus officio doctrine expresses the principle of finality

  • Telkom Kenya Limited v John Ochanda
    [2014] eKLR

    Functus officio prevents re-opening of a matter before a court that rendered the final decision

  • Dakianga Distributors Kenya Ltd v Kenya Seed Company Limited
    [2015] eKLR

    Taxing master's power depends on and is limited to what the trial court directed

  • Adero & Another v Ulinzi Sacco Society Limited
    [2002] 1 KLR 577

    Jurisdiction either exists or does not ab initio and cannot be conferred by consent

Jurisdiction invoked
Original and supervisory jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over the suit and its execution proceedings, including taxation of costs (rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order 2009 considered)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ali & 2 others v Boit & another", Case Analysis (2022). Environment & Land Case 200 of 2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/4778/eng@2022-09-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.