Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedPetition dated 8th December 2021· [2022] KEELC 3935 (KLR)

Mathare Valley Residents v Mathare Vocational Training Centre & 3 others (Environment & Land Petition E051 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 3935 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
28 July 2022
7,862 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~31 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court dismissed Mathare Valley residents' land petition because they failed to prove their group's existence, plead specific constitutional violations, or act within legal deadlines.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, described as Mathare Valley Residents and acting through its chairman Samuel Githuka Njenga, petitioned in December 2021 concerning L.R No. 219/33, Mathare Valley, said to have been compulsorily acquired by the Government in 1970 and later placed in the custody of Undugu Society of Kenya (2nd Respondent), which built and ran a vocational training centre before handing the property over to the Ministry of Culture and Social Services around 1983. The Petitioner sought declarations that the land is public land held by the Nairobi City County Government for the people of Mathare Valley, that allotments and grants over it are void, and orders compelling the National Land Commission to review dispositions and the County Government to determine the land's use through public participation. The 2nd and 3rd Respondents denied any current claim over the property and challenged the Petitioner's standing and pleading. The 1st and 4th Respondents did not respond. The court framed three issues and dismissed the Petition on all of them. First, the Petitioner was an amorphous body of undisclosed composition with no evidence of registration or constitution, and therefore lacked locus standi. Second, the Petition invoked no constitutional Article and pleaded no particulars of any violation, contrary to the Anarita Karimi Njeru standard, rendering it fatally deficient. Third, the reliefs were unattainable: the NLC's five-year mandate under Section 14(1) of the National Land Commission Act had lapsed by about 2017, and the NLC, an independent commission under Article 249, alone administers public land under Articles 62(2) and 67(2). The Petition was dismissed with no orders as to costs, each party bearing its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Locus standi of the Petitioner

Holding

The Petitioner, an amorphous body whose composition and registration were not disclosed, lacks locus standi and is non-suited

Reasoning

Although Article 260 of the Constitution extends standing to unincorporated associations, a group must describe itself, show registration or a constitution evidencing membership and interests. The deponent merely said he was chairman of 'Mathare Valley Residents' without evidence of the body's existence, membership or election. The court adopted Michael Osundwa Sakwa and Kituo Cha Sheria, holding the relaxation of locus standi does not open the gates to amorphous clusters.

p. 9
02

Particularity of constitutional petitions

Holding

The Petition, drafted in prose without invoking any constitutional provision or pleading particulars of violation, is fatally deficient

Reasoning

Relying on Anarita Karimi Njeru and Mumo Matemu, the court held that a petitioner must identify the constitutional provisions infringed, the manner of breach and the responsible party. The Petition cited not a single Article, made general and omnibus allegations, and supplied no evidence of the alleged diminution of acreage, alienations, or titles; such drafting cannot be cured by Article 159.

p. 10
03

Availability of the reliefs sought

Holding

None of the reliefs could issue: the NLC's review mandate had lapsed, and neither the County Government nor the court can direct the use of public land in place of the NLC

Reasoning

Section 14(1) of the National Land Commission Act limited the review of grants to five years, which expired around 2017. Under Articles 62(2) and 67(2), public land vests in the county but is administered by the NLC, an independent commission under Article 249 not subject to direction or control. Orders against the 1st and 3rd Respondents would be in vanity.

p. 13

Legal principles established

#
  • An unregistered association or group must still exhibit some semblance of legal existence or registration before mounting a constitutional petition
  • Constitutional petitions must be pleaded with particularity, identifying the violated provisions, the manner of violation and the violator
  • The National Land Commission's mandate to review grants and dispositions of public land was time-bound to five years from commencement of the National Land Commission Act 2012

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Petition dated the 8th December 2021 is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs; each party to bear own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 22, 23, 62(1)(a), 62(2), 67(2), 68(c)(v), 159, 249(1) and (2), 258, 260, 3(1), 10, 73
  • National Land Commission ActSection 14(1); Sections 5(1)(a), 5(2)
  • Land ActSection 12
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21)Sections 1A and 1B
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Act (Cap 9)Sections 3A and 3B
  • Political Parties Act2011

Cases cited (10)

  • Mumo Matemu v Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance & 5 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Suleiman Habarufa Komora & Another v The County Government of Tana River & 2 Others
    (2020) eKLR
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v Attorney General (Republic)
    (1979) eKLR
  • Alfred Njau & Others v The City Council of Nairobi
    (1982) KAR 229
  • Kituo Cha Sheria v John Ndirangu Kariuki & Another
    (2013) eKLR
  • Buru Buru Farmers Company Ltd v Vincent Paul Omondi Obonyo & 4 Others
    (2020) eKLR
  • Republic v Kenya National Examination Counsel Ex-parte Geoffrey Gathenji & Others
    (1997) eKLR
  • Michael Osundwa Sakwa v Chief Justice and President of the Supreme Court of Kenya & another
    [2016] eKLR
  • In the Matter of National Land Commission
    (2015) eKLR
  • Cordison International Kenya Ltd v Chairman National Land Commission & 44 Others
    (2019) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 22, 258 and 260 of the Constitution, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mathare Valley Residents v Mathare Vocational Training Centre & 3 others (Environment & Land Petition E051 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 3935 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Petition dated 8th December 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3935/eng@2022-07-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.