Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutNot stated in the judgment excerpt· [2022] KEELC 3624 (KLR)

Minazini Enterprises Limited & 2 others v SBM Bank(K) & another (Environment & Land Case 203 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 3624 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
17 May 2022
781 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Mombasa struck out a land dispute as res judicata, warning that relitigating already-decided cases wastes time and invites costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Environment and Land Court at Mombasa (N A Matheka, J) determined a preliminary objection raised by the 2nd defendant in a suit by Abdalla Mohamed Abdalla and another plaintiff against the County Government of Mombasa and the 2nd defendant. The 2nd defendant objected that the suit was res judicata, that it disclosed no cause of action against it concerning securities allegedly created between the plaintiffs and the 1st defendant, and that it was an abuse of court process. The court set out the classic definitions of a preliminary objection from Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Company Ltd vs West End Distributors Ltd and Oraro vs Mbajja, confirming that res judicata may be raised as a pure point of law. On perusing the pleadings in the prior suits - ELC Case No 285 of 2015, Civil Appeal No 114 of 2018 and ELC Misc Application No 12 of 2019, all between Abdalla Mohamed Abdalla and the County Government of Mombasa - the court found that the plaintiff's claims concerning trespass, illegal acquisition of the suit properties, removal of a road and compensation of Kshs 56,000,000 had already been litigated, dismissed on first instance and on appeal to the Court of Appeal, and a further application struck out as res judicata. The parties and subject matter were identical; joinder of the 1st plaintiff and 1st defendant could not cure the defect. The court found the 2nd plaintiff was becoming a vexatious litigant, upheld the preliminary objection and struck out the suit as against the 2nd defendant with costs to that defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether res judicata may properly be raised by preliminary objection

Holding

Yes; res judicata is a point of law properly raised as a preliminary objection where the prior suits are on record and the identity of parties, subject matter and issues is apparent from the pleadings

Reasoning

The court adopted the classic formulation in Mukisa Biscuit and Oraro vs Mbajja, noting that a preliminary objection must be a pure point of law. Having perused the pleadings in the three prior suits, the court found on their face that the parties and subject matter were identical and the issues had been litigated to the Court of Appeal, so no factual investigation was required. The objection was therefore properly before the court and merited.

p. 2
02

Whether the current suit is res judicata and an abuse of process

Holding

Yes; the suit is res judicata as against the 2nd defendant, duplicates ELC Case No 285 of 2015 and its progeny, and is an abuse of the court process

Reasoning

The plaintiff had previously sued the County Government of Mombasa claiming trespass and compensation over the same road construction on the same properties; that suit was dismissed, the appeal dismissed, and a subsequent miscellaneous application struck out as res judicata. The parties were the same (plaintiff and 2nd defendant), the subject matter identical, and the issues had been litigated up to the Court of Appeal. Adding the 1st plaintiff and 1st defendant did not cure the defect.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection consists of a point of law pleaded or arising by clear implication from the pleadings which, if argued as a preliminary point, may dispose of the suit
  • A matter that requires investigation of facts cannot be raised as a preliminary objection
  • Where parties and subject matter are the same and issues were litigated to the Court of Appeal, a subsequent suit is res judicata and an abuse of court process; persisting in such litigation verges on vexatious litigiousness

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection is upheld and the suit is struck out as against the 2nd defendant
  2. 2.Costs of the suit awarded to the 2nd defendant

Authorities

#

Cases cited (2)

  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Company Ltd vs West End Distributors Ltd
    (1969) E A 696
  • Oraro vs Mbajja
    (2005) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over a suit concerning land; not stated by reference to a specific constitutional or statutory provision

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Minazini Enterprises Limited & 2 others v SBM Bank(K) & another (Environment & Land Case 203 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 3624 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3624/eng@2022-05-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.