Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 5th July 2022)· [2022] KEELC 3591 (KLR)

Delta Connections Limited v Deche (Environment & Land Case 16 of 2019) [2022] KEELC 3591 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
19 July 2022
1,880 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court allowed a family burial on disputed land, ruling that burying a relative there doesn't create ownership and any harm can be compensated with money.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by M.A. Odeny J of the Environment and Land Court at Malindi, dated 19th July 2022, determined a Notice of Motion dated 5th July 2022 by the Plaintiff seeking to restrain the Defendant from interring the remains of his mother, Mwaka Deche Chinyaka, on Plot No. 67 Group 1 Takaungu pending trial. The Plaintiff, the registered owner, sought vacant possession in the main suit and relied on its title, arguing a prima facie case, irreparable harm and balance of convenience, and cited Naibor Ajijik Group Ranch and Macedonia Resort Club. The Defendant opposed, asserting long occupation (over 40 years), res judicata arising from prior suits (Kilifi SRMCC No. 32 of 1996 and related appeals), a prior determined injunction application, adequacy of damages given the pleaded value of Kshs 3 million, and that burial confers no title, relying on Ali Mwaduna, Dinah Caren Ondiek Akinyi and Lena Namarome Wafula. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown, the court held that ownership remained undetermined; the Plaintiff would suffer no irreparable harm since the land's value was ascertainable and burial confers no title, citing with approval the holding that burial does not vest title in the deceased's estate; and the balance of convenience favoured the occupying Defendant, with exhumation available should the Plaintiff succeed. The court dismissed the application, vacated the interim injunction orders, and awarded costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Prima facie case

Holding

Plaintiff is registered owner, but ownership is contested and pending determination

Reasoning

The Plaintiff produced title and an official search, but the Defendant claims occupation for over 40 years and pleads res judicata from prior suits. The court noted the suit land has a checkered litigation history and the ownership issue is yet to be tried.

p. 3
02

Irreparable harm

Holding

No irreparable harm; land valued at Kshs 3 million is ascertainable and compensable in damages; burial confers no title

Reasoning

The court agreed with Okongo J that burial on disputed land does not confer title, and since ownership remains undecided, exhumation is an available remedy if the Plaintiff ultimately succeeds.

p. 4
03

Balance of convenience

Holding

Tilts against granting the injunction since the Defendant resides on a portion of the land and the body would remain in the mortuary at his expense

Reasoning

The court found it not disputed that the Defendant occupies a portion of the suit land, and adopted the reasoning in Ernest Kiprop Arap Kogo that possession and mortuary considerations favour allowing burial, with exhumation possible if the Plaintiff wins.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Interring the remains of a deceased person on disputed land does not confer title on the estate or beneficiaries
  • The Giella v Cassman Brown principles govern the grant of interlocutory injunctions

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 5th July 2022 is dismissed/disallowed
  2. 2.The interim orders of injunction are vacated
  3. 3.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21(1)

Cases cited (7)

  • Naibor Ajijik Group Ranch v Agriculture Development Corporation (ADC) & 3 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Macedonia Resort Club Ltd v Silvans Awili
    [2016] eKLR
  • Ali Mwaduna v Masha Mukadha
    [2019] eKLR
  • Dinah Caren Ondiek Akinyi v Leukadia Ajwang Ondoro & Thadius Otieno Ondoro
    [2014] eKLR
  • Lena Namarome Wafula v Angelas Wepukulu & Another
    [2013] eKLR
  • Giella vs Cassman Brown & Co Ltd
    [1973] E.A 358
  • Ernest Kiprop Arap Kogo v John Kibet & 2 others
    [2019] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes; application brought under Certificate of Urgency (injunction principles per Giella v Cassman Brown)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Delta Connections Limited v Deche (Environment & Land Case 16 of 2019) [2022] KEELC 3591 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 5th July 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3591/eng@2022-07-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.