Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Petition (Mombasa) E016 of 2022· [2022] KEELC 3486 (KLR)

Abdalla & 6 others v Khansa Developers Limited & 3 others (Environment and Land Constitutional Petition 16 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 3486 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
26 July 2022
7,373 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~29 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed it can hear land planning disputes when no Liaison Committee exists, but environmental assessment claims must go to the environment tribunal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Mombasa (LL Naikuni, J) determined a preliminary objection dated May 24, 2022 raised by the 1st and 2nd respondents, who sought striking out of the petitioners' notice of motion dated May 5, 2022 on grounds that it offended section 72(3) and (4) of PLUPA and section 129(1) of EMCA, 1999 and the doctrines of exhaustion and constitutional avoidance. The petitioners, owners of parcels adjacent to the impugned 18-storey development on plot Mombasa/Block XXVI/595, alleged infringement of articles 10, 40, 42, 47, 69 and 70 of the Constitution, including the right to a clean and healthy environment, fair administrative action and public participation, and sought permanent and temporary injunctions against the development and the issuing of further approvals. The court found the preliminary objection properly raised as pure points of law. On jurisdiction, it held that section 72 PLUPA applies only to persons aggrieved by enforcement notices, which the petitioners were not; and since the County Physical and Land Use Planning Liaison Committee for Mombasa was never constituted, section 93 of PLUPA vested jurisdiction in the ELC. Applying the Anarita Karimi precision test, the court found the petition was not a mere bootstrap and the exhaustion doctrine did not bar it. However, following Kibos Distillers, reliefs concerning fresh EIA and environmental audit were reserved to the National Environment Tribunal. The objection was allowed only to that extent, with the petition to be heard within ninety days, conservatory orders extended, and each party bearing its own costs given the public interest.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection was properly raised as a pure point of law

Holding

The objection was properly raised as it raised pure questions of law on jurisdiction and exhaustion that could terminate the petition

Reasoning

Applying Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing and later Supreme Court pronouncements, the court found the objection raised serious pure issues of law (jurisdiction, exhaustion) capable of terminating the petition without ascertaining contested facts, thus passing the propriety test.

p. 8
02

Whether the court has jurisdiction over the petition

Holding

Yes - section 72(3) and (4) PLUPA applies only to persons aggrieved by enforcement notices; the petitioners were not served with any enforcement notice, and since the Liaison Committee was never constituted, section 93 of PLUPA vests jurisdiction in the ELC

Reasoning

The court found the Liaison Committee for Mombasa County had never been constituted, a fact unrebutted by the respondents. Under section 93 PLUPA, disputes before establishment of such committees are heard by the ELC. The petition also raised enforcement of constitutional rights under articles 69 and 70, matters reserved to the High Court and courts of equal status.

03

Whether the doctrines of exhaustion and constitutional avoidance barred the petition

Holding

Not applicable to the constitutional petition; the petition was precisely pleaded under Anarita Karimi and thus not a bootstrap, though EIA/audit reliefs were reserved to the NET

Reasoning

The petition particularised the rights infringed (articles 42, 10, 69(d), 47, 40) and the manner of infringement with reasonable precision, so it was not a mere pretext. Enforcement of fundamental rights can only be determined by the High Court and courts of equal status. However, following Kibos Distillers, matters of fresh EIA and environmental audit belong to the NET.

p. 13

Legal principles established

#
  • Where the County Physical and Land Use Planning Liaison Committee has not been established, disputes relating to physical and land use planning fall to be heard and determined by the Environment and Land Court under section 93 of PLUPA
  • A suit primarily seeking to enforce fundamental rights and freedoms, properly pleaded with precision, is not barred by the doctrine of exhaustion

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the notice of motion dated May 5, 2022 and the main petition dated May 5, 2022 under section 93(1) of PLUPA as long as no Liaison Committee is established for the County Government of Mombasa
  2. 2.Declaration that the doctrine of exhaustion and constitutional avoidance is not applicable to the main petition
  3. 3.Declaration that all matters pertaining to issuance of fresh EIA, Environmental Audit and issuance of a report under prayers (b)(iv) & (v) be dealt with and finalized by the National Environment Tribunal within fourteen (14) days, to that extent the preliminary objection be and is hereby allowed
  4. 4.Notice of motion application and main petition to be heard and finally disposed of within ninety (90) days from the date of the ruling
  5. 5.Mention on October 12, 2022 for ascertainment of compliance and further orders
  6. 6.Interim conservatory orders granted extended to October 12, 2022
  7. 7.Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenyaarticles 10, 20, 21, 24, 27, 40, 42, 47, 69, 70, 159(2)(c), 162(2)(b), 258, 259(1)
  • Physical and Land Use Planning Act (PLUPA)sections 72(3) and (4), 73, 93(1)
  • Environment Management and Co-ordination Act (EMCA, 1999)sections 3, 125(1), 129(1), 130
  • Environment and Land Court Act, No 19 of 2011sections 4 and 13

Cases cited (25)

  • Mohamed Ali Salim & 2 others v Municipal Council of Mombasa & others
    eKLR
  • Depar Limited v County Executive Committee Member for Lands, Physical Planning, Housing and Urbanization & another
    [2021] eKLR
  • Immaculate Gicuku Mugo v Kiambu County Government
    [2021] eKLR
  • John Muthui & 19 others v County Government of Kitui & 7 others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Joyce Mutindi Muthama & another v Josephat Kyololo Wambua & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co Limited v West End Distributors Limited
    (1969) EA 696
  • Speaker of the National Assembly v James Njenga Karume
    [1992] eKLR; Civil Application No NAI 92 of 1992
  • Bernard Murage v Fine Serve Africa Limited & 3 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Kibos Distillers Limited & 4 others v Benson Ambuti Adega & 3 others
    [2020] eKLR; Civil Appeal No 153 of 2019; Supreme Court Petition No 3 of 2020
  • Omondi v National Bank of Kenya Ltd & others
    [2001] KLR 579; [2001] 1 EA 177
  • Attorney General & Another v Andrew Mwaura Githinji & another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v Republic
    [1980] KLR 154; [1979] eKLR; [1976-1980] KLR 1272
  • Mumo Matemu v Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance & another
    [2013] eKLR
  • Thorp v Holdsworth
    (1886) 3 Ch D 637
  • Isiolo County Assembly Service Board & another v Principal Secretary (Devolution) Ministry of Devolution and Planning & another
    Petition No 370 of 2015; [2016] eKLR
  • Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission v Jane Cheperenger & 2 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Hassan Ali Joho & another v Suleiman Said Shahbal & 2 others
    Petition No 10 of 2013, [2014] eKLR
  • Hassan Nyanje Charo v Khatib Mwashetani & 3 others
    Civil Application No 23 of 2014, [2014] eKLR
  • Aviation & Allied Workers Union Kenya v Kenya Airways Ltd & 3 others
    Application No 50 of 2014, [2015] eKLR
  • Owners of Motor Vessel "Lilian S" v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Limited
    [1989] eKLR
  • Samwuel Kamau Macharia & another v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 others
    [2012] eKLR
  • Geoffrey Muthiga Kabiru & 2 others v Samuel Munga Henry & 1756 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Stanley Mungathia Daudi and 4 others v Hon Cyprian Kubai and others
    Meru Petition No 5 of 2013
  • William Odhiambo Ramogi & 3 others v Attorney General & 4 others; Muslims for Human Rights & 2 others (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR
  • R v Karisa Chengo
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and sections 4 and 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, No 19 of 2011; section 93 of the Physical and Land Use Planning Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Abdalla & 6 others v Khansa Developers Limited & 3 others (Environment and Land Constitutional Petition 16 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 3486 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC Petition (Mombasa) E016 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3486/eng@2022-07-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.