Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissed· [2022] KEELC 3442 (KLR)

Warirah v Deputy County Commissioner, Kasarani Sub County, Nairobi County & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 119 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 3442 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
21 July 2022
2,386 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court ruled the NG-CDF Board can be sued over land disputes and stayed in the case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling on an application dated January 10, 2022 by the 4th defendant, the National Government Constituencies Development Fund Board, seeking to have its name struck out from the suit on grounds that it was wrongly joined, lacked capacity to be sued, that no cause of action was disclosed against it, and that the plaintiff had failed to exhaust the dispute resolution mechanisms under section 56 of the NG-CDF Act and section 9 of the Fair Administrative Action Act. The plaintiff opposed, asserting title to the suit property which had been fenced off and signage erected reading 'Kasarani Public Grounds Funded By CDF-KASARANI', amounting to alleged compulsory acquisition without compensation. The court framed the issues as capacity to be sued and the doctrine of exhaustion. On capacity, it held that under section 14 of the NG-CDF Act the Board is a body corporate with perpetual succession capable of suing and being sued, and that order 1 rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules bars defeat of a suit for misjoinder. The court distinguished Kenafric Properties and Njoka as concerning CDF project implementation, not land title. On exhaustion, applying the Supreme Court's decision in Benson Ambuti Adega v Kibos Distillers, it held the dispute concerns title to land and compensation for compulsory acquisition under articles 62, 63 and 64 of the Constitution, not administration of the CDF Act, so the exhaustion doctrine was inapplicable. The application was dismissed with costs to abide the outcome of the suit, and the National Land Commission was joined as an interested party, with the plaintiff directed to amend pleadings and serve it.

Key legal issues

#
01

Capacity of the NG-CDF Board to be sued

Holding

The Board has capacity to sue and be sued and was properly joined as a defendant

Reasoning

Section 14 of the National Government Constituencies Development Fund Act establishes the Board as a body corporate with perpetual succession capable of suing and being sued. This statutory provision disposes of the applicant's claim that it lacks capacity. The court also distinguished the Kenafric and Njoka authorities as concerning CDF project implementation and contract disputes, whereas the present dispute concerns title to land.

p. 4
02

Doctrine of exhaustion of remedies

Holding

The doctrine does not apply because the dispute concerns land title and compulsory acquisition, not administration of the CDF Act

Reasoning

Although section 56 of the NG-CDF Act requires disputes to be referred to the Board first, the court found the dispute before it does not concern administration of the statute or implementation of CDF projects. The court will have to determine the category of the suit land under articles 62, 63 and 64 of the Constitution, the plaintiff's proprietary interests, and compensation for compulsory acquisition - matters beyond section 56 and section 9 of the Fair Administrative Action Act.

p. 5
03

Joinder of the National Land Commission

Holding

The NLC is a necessary party and should be joined as an interested party

Reasoning

Given the emotive nature of land disputes and the need to determine the category of the suit land and questions of compulsory acquisition, the court considered it necessary to have the National Land Commission on board, invoking order 1 rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, and directed the plaintiff to amend pleadings and serve the NLC.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • No suit shall be defeated by reason of misjoinder or non-joinder of parties
  • The NG-CDF Board is a body corporate capable of suing and being sued
  • The exhaustion doctrine applies only to disputes arising from the administration of the CDF Act, not civil land-title disputes

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated January 10, 2022 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the suit
  3. 3.The National Land Commission be joined in the proceedings as an interested party under order 1 rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules
  4. 4.The plaintiff is directed to amend their pleadings and serve the same upon the National Land Commission

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • National Government Constituencies Development Fund Actsection 4
  • National Government Constituencies Development Fund Actsection 14
  • National Government Constituencies Development Fund Actsection 36(1)
  • National Government Constituencies Development Fund Actsection 56(1) and (3)
  • Fair Administrative Action Actsection 9
  • Civil Procedure Rulesorder 1 rule 9
  • Civil Procedure Rulesorder 1 rule 10(2)
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 162(2)(b)
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticles 62, 63 and 64
  • Environment and Land Court Actsection 13(2)

Cases cited (13)

  • Kenafric Properties Ltd vs Ruaraka Constituency Development Fund Committee & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Eaton Towers Kenya Ltd vs Ken Kasinga and 5 others
    [2022] eKLR
  • Joseph Kariuki Njoka t/a Jofoko Constructors vs P. Mbogo Karanja & 2 others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Kibos Distillers Limited & 4 Others vs Benson Ambuti Adega & 3 others
    (2020) eKLR
  • Benedict Wechuli vs Navakholo Constituency Development Fund & Another
    [2017] eKLR
  • Richard Maina Mwangi vs John Kaguchia - Chairman Mukurweini Constituency Development Fund Committee & another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Peter Kinyua Kimemia & 3 others vs Embakasi North Constituency Development Fund Account Manager & 2 Others
    [2021] eKLR
  • James Marienga Obonyo and 2 Others vs Fund Manager Suna West National Government Constituency Development Fund Committee & Another
    [2019] eKLR
  • Ernest Muriuki Mungai vs Gichugu Constituency Developmnet Fund & Another
    2017 eKLR
  • Civicon Ltd v Kivuwatt Ltd & 2 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Departed Asians Property Custodian Board vs Jaffer Brothers Ltd
    (1999) 1EA 55
  • Benson Ambuti Adega & 2 others v Kibos Distillers Limited & 5 others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Albert Chaurembo Mumba & 7 others v Maurice Munyao & 148 others
    [2019] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and section 13(2) of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Warirah v Deputy County Commissioner, Kasarani Sub County, Nairobi County & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 119 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 3442 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3442/eng@2022-07-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.