Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC Constitutional Petition No. 49 of 2021· [2022] KEELC 3309 (KLR)

Balicha & another v Ellen Properties Limited & 12 others (Constitutional Petition 49 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 3309 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
21 July 2022
2,061 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court in Mombasa consolidated six land disputes over the same two plots into one case to avoid conflicting decisions.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Environment and Land Court at Mombasa (L.L. Naikuni, J) delivered this ruling on a Notice of Motion dated 16th February 2022 by the 1st and 2nd Respondents, Margaret Muthoni Ndungu and Elen Properties Limited, seeking consolidation of ELC Constitutional Petition No. 49 of 2021 with ELC No. 165 of 2019, ELC No. 134 of 2018, ELC No. 111 of 2021, CMCC No. 1648 of 2019 and CMCC (ELC) No. 48 of 2021, all concerning Plots Nos. 386/1/MN and 264/1/MN. The application was supported by an affidavit of Margaret Muthoni Ndungu sworn on 16th February 2022. It was opposed by the 2nd Petitioner through grounds of opposition describing the application as misconceived and an abuse of process, arguing the parties and issues differed across the suits, and by the 1st Petitioner, Dennis Maitha Balicha, acting in person, through a replying affidavit noting the dissimilarity of parties in ELC No. 53 of 2021. The court framed three issues: whether the application met the threshold for consolidation, whether the opposing issues were justifiable, and costs. Relying on Section 81(h) of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held the suits shared a common subject matter and overlapping parties, that consolidation would avoid multiplicity of suits and conflicting decisions, and that the issues could be adjudicated in one suit. The application was allowed; the suits were consolidated with ELC No. 49 of 2021 as the lead file; the CM Court suits were transferred under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act; the Petitioners were granted 21 days to amend pleadings; the hearing was rescheduled to 7th October 2022; and each party was ordered to bear their own costs given the public interest involved.

Key legal issues

#
01

Consolidation of suits

Holding

The application met the threshold for consolidation because the suits share the same subject matter (Plots 386/1/MN and 264/1/MN) and overlapping parties, and consolidation avoids multiplicity of suits and conflicting decisions

Reasoning

The court found that the common denominator across the suits was the two plots, LR Plot No. 386/1/MN and Plot No. 264/1/MN. All suits except ELC No. 53 of 2021 sought revocation of title on grounds of fraud or adverse possession, and these issues could be comfortably adjudicated in one suit. Some parties overlapped across matters, and the court had already consolidated ELC 165/2019 and 53/2021 with the Petition on 9th March 2022, so this case should not be an exception.

p. 6
02

Grounds of opposition and replying affidavit

Holding

The objections raised by the 1st and 2nd Petitioners lacked merit and were dismissed

Reasoning

The court considered the four-point grounds of opposition filed by the 2nd Petitioner (which argued the application was misconceived, an abuse of process, and that parties and issues differed, e.g. adverse possession versus revocation of title) and the 1st Petitioner's replying affidavit (which argued dissimilarity of parties in ELC No. 53 of 2021). Despite the substantive difference in relief in ELC 53 of 2021 acknowledged elsewhere in the judgment, the court held the objections bore no merit and dismissed them.

p. 7
03

Costs

Holding

Each party to bear their own costs because the matter involves several issues of public interest

Reasoning

Although the general rule is that costs follow the event, the court departed from it. The court reasoned that the instant case involves several matters of public interest and that it would therefore be fair that each party bears its own costs of the application.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • The principles governing consolidation of suits are founded under Section 81(h) of the Civil Procedure Act, aimed at avoiding multiplicity of suits and conflicting decisions over the same subject matter
  • Costs follow the event and are at the discretion of the court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 16th February, 2022 be and is hereby allowed
  2. 2.All the civil suits known as ELC No. 165 of 2019, ELC No. 134 of 2018, ELC 111 of 2021, CMCC 1648 of 2019 and CMC (ELC) No. 48 of 2021 to be consolidated and become one suit
  3. 3.Any other matter with a similar subject matter filed thereafter or pending in any other court to be automatically consolidated with this suit
  4. 4.Pursuant to Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, CMCC (ELC) No. 1648 of 2019 and CMCC No. 48 of 2021 be transferred from the CM Court to this court for consolidation, hearing and determination
  5. 5.ELC No. 49 of 2021 be the lead file where all filings and proceedings take effect
  6. 6.The 1st and 2nd Petitioners granted 21 days leave to amend and serve their pleadings
  7. 7.The scheduled hearing taken out of the cause list and re-scheduled to 7th October, 2022, with the site visit to be re-planned
  8. 8.Each party to bear their costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21Section 1A
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21Section 1B
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21Section 3A
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21Section 81(h)
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21Section 18
  • Constitution of Kenya(general reference)
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 81(h) of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21; Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Balicha & another v Ellen Properties Limited & 12 others (Constitutional Petition 49 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 3309 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC Constitutional Petition No. 49 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3309/eng@2022-07-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.