Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Suit No E001 of 2021· [2022] KEELC 3229 (KLR)

People Like Us CBO v Kimaru & 4 others (Environment & Land Case 016 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 3229 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 June 2022
602 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Isiolo refused to strike out a community group's land case, ruling that early objections must rest on pure points of law, not arguments.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Isiolo, delivered by Hon Justice P M Njoroge on 6 June 2022, dismissing a notice of preliminary objection raised by the 2nd and 4th defendants seeking to strike out the plaintiff's suit. The objection, dated 23 November 2021, contended that the suit offended the mandatory provisions of Order 1 rule 13 and Order 1 rule 8(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, apparently concerning the capacity of the three officials through whom the CBO sued. The court noted the objection raised issues similar to those in Isiolo ELC E001 of 2021 and adopted the reasoning of its earlier ruling in that matter. Justice Njoroge observed that the plaintiff had not denied that the three persons who filed the suit were not members of the plaintiff, but held that even if all other members were disqualified, the three purported officials retained the right to prosecute the suit on their own behalf; striking out the case would deny them their right to seek justice. He further held that the issues raised could be canvassed at the hearing of the main suit, and that the preliminary objection evinced arguments, rendering it not based on pure points of law. The court dismissed the preliminary objection, ordered costs to be in the cause, and directed the parties to take directions on 4 July 2022, with the plaintiff's advocate, Mr Ashava, to serve the mention date on the defendants.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection qualified as a pure point of law justifying striking out the suit

Holding

The objection did not; it evinced arguments and was not based on pure points of law, and was dismissed

Reasoning

The court found that the three officials who filed the suit had the right to prosecute it on their own behalf even if the other members were disqualified, so striking out would deny them access to justice. The objection also raised arguments rather than pure points of law, taking it outside the proper scope of a preliminary objection. The court aligned itself with its earlier ruling in Isiolo ELC E001 of 2021, which raised similar issues.

p. 3
02

Whether the suit could be struck out in toto at the preliminary stage

Holding

No - the issues raised in the PO could be canvassed during the hearing of the main suit

Reasoning

The court held that even if it disqualified all other members of the plaintiff, the three purported officials retained the right to prosecute the suit on their own behalf, so the case could not be struck out in toto at that stage.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A suit should not be struck out in toto on a preliminary objection where the objection raises contested arguments rather than pure points of law and where the persons suing retain a right to prosecute the suit on their own behalf

Court orders

#
  1. 1.This notice of preliminary objection is hereby dismissed
  2. 2.Costs shall be in the cause
  3. 3.Parties will take directions on July 4, 2022 and the plaintiff's advocate, Mr Ashava, to serve the mention date upon the defendants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 rule 13
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 rule 8(1)

Cases cited (1)

  • Isiolo Vision of Hope Youth Development Programmes CBO v Erick Mureithi Kimaru & 4 others
    Isiolo ELC suit No E001 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court; the court also references its ruling in Isiolo ELC E001 of 2021

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "People Like Us CBO v Kimaru & 4 others (Environment & Land Case 016 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 3229 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC Suit No E001 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3229/eng@2022-06-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.