Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedPetition No E12 of 2020· [2022] KEELC 3091 (KLR)

Mohamed & 171 others v National Environment Management Authority & 4 others; Member of Parliament Ganze Constituency & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E12 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 3091 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 May 2022
2,317 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kilifi residents stopped a county government's mining through court orders, confirming county governments can be restrained in Kenyan courts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Malindi (M.A. Odeny, J) determined a Notice of Motion dated 31st August 2021 by petitioners, residents of Jaribuni, Ganze Sub-County, seeking conservatory orders by way of injunction restraining the County Government of Kilifi from continuing mining minerals activities at Jaribuni pending determination of their petition. The petitioners deponed, through Walter Chilumo, that the land is community land with iron ore deposits whose unlicensed artisanal mining causes dust, noise and air pollution and environmental degradation, threatening health and the right to a clean environment. The County Government opposed, arguing an injunction cannot issue against it, the petitioners had not joined the mining companies, and the Giella thresholds were unmet. The 2nd, 3rd and 5th respondents supported the application, stating no mining permits or licences were issued and the activities violate the Mining Act 2016; NEMA confirmed no EIA application was ever submitted. The court framed two issues: whether an injunction can issue against a county government, and whether the threshold for conservatory orders was met. Relying on Lawrence Ogaro Onyiego and James Muigai Thungu, it held that Section 16(2) of the Government Proceedings Act does not protect county governments from injunctive orders. Applying the public-law principles in Uhuru Secondary School, Gatirau Peter Munya, JSC v Speaker, and Wambora, it found imminent, real danger to constitutional rights and granted conservatory orders pending the hearing of the petition, with liberty to the parties to engage in mediation. No costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an injunction can issue against a County government

Holding

Yes; the Government Proceedings Act bar does not extend to County governments

Reasoning

The court adopted the decisions of Mutungi J and Obaga J holding that neither the Government Proceedings Act nor the County Government Act protects county governments from injunctive orders. Had the legislature intended county governments to enjoy the national government's protection, the Government Proceedings Act would have been expressly amended to include them. Consequently no statutory bar exists against injunctions directed at county governments.

p. 4
02

Whether the petitioners met the threshold for conservatory orders

Holding

Yes; conservatory orders granted pending determination of the petition

Reasoning

Applying the principles in Board of Management of Uhuru Secondary School and Gatirau Peter Munya, the court treated the relief as public-law in character. The unlicensed mining had no EIA and was supported by the 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 1st respondents' confirmations that no licences or EIA existed. Dust pollution and environmental degradation posed an imminent, real danger to the rights to a clean environment and health, justifying conservatory relief.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 16(2) of the Government Proceedings Act does not apply to County governments and does not bar injunctive orders against them
  • There is no law or procedure barring the court from issuing orders of injunction against County governments
  • Conservatory orders are public law remedies in rem meant to keep the subject matter of the dispute in situ, not private interlocutory injunctions
  • In granting conservatory orders the danger looming over the realization of rights must be imminent, real and not theoretical

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Conservatory orders granted pending the hearing and determination of the petition
  2. 2.Parties at liberty to engage in mediation to amicably settle the matter

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Mining Act2016
  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act (EMCA)1999
  • Constitution of Kenya2010; Article 23
  • Government Proceedings (Amendment) ActNo. 35 of 2015, Section 2
  • Government Proceedings ActSection 16(2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules2010, Order 29 Rule 2(d); Order 21(1)
  • County Government Act2012
  • Community Land Act2016

Cases cited (11)

  • County Government of Isiolo v Sharrif Ibrahim Farah
    [2019] eKLR
  • B vs. Attorney General
    [2004] 1 KLR 431
  • Kalya Soi Farmers Cooperative Society v Paul Kirui & another
    [2013] eKLR
  • Giella Casman Brown
  • Lawrence Ogaro Onyiego & Another vs Samwel Minika & Another
    [2017] eKLR
  • James Muigai Thungu vs County Government of Trans Nzoia & 2 Others
    [2017]
  • Board of Management of Uhuru Secondary School v City County Director of Education & 2 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Gatirau Peter Munya v Dickson Mwenda Kithinji & 2 others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Centre for Rights Education and Awareness (CREAW) & 7 others v Attorney General
    Nairobi High Court Petition No. 16 of 2011; [2011] eKLR
  • Judicial Service Commission v Speaker of the National Assembly & Another
    {2013} eKLR
  • Martin Nyaga Wambora v Speaker of The County of Assembly of Embu & 3 others
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitution of Kenya, Article 23 (conservatory orders in enforcement of Bill of Rights); petition invoking the right to a clean and healthy environment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mohamed & 171 others v National Environment Management Authority & 4 others; Member of Parliament Ganze Constituency & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E12 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 3091 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Petition No E12 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3091/eng@2022-05-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.