Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedMeru ELC Case (applications dated 16.11.2020 and 26.2.2021; preliminary objection dated 2.3.2021)· [2022] KEELC 2948 (KLR)

Stanley & another v Mwongera & 5 others; Rutere & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case 151 of 2017) [2022] KEELC 2948 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 May 2022
3,405 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed it can hear land sale contract disputes and consolidated related cases into one court for faster resolution.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Meru (C.K. Nzili, ELC Judge, delivered 11 May 2022) determines two applications and a preliminary objection arising in a suit filed on 12 May 2017 by the plaintiffs against the defendants over L.R No. Abothuguchi/Mariene/980, in which the plaintiffs claimed customary trust, unlawful transfer and interference, and sought cancellation of subdivisions and title deeds and a permanent injunction. The 1st defendant counterclaimed, asserting he had purchased the land in 1995 and sold it to the interested parties on 25 December 2016. The interested parties, joined in May 2019 as alleged innocent purchasers, sought transfer of the ELC suit to SPMCC Githongo for consolidation with Meru CMCC No. 194 of 2018 (their suit against the 1st defendant for specific performance) and, by preliminary objection, contended the ELC lacked jurisdiction over a contractual dispute. The plaintiffs sought consolidation of the lower court file into this suit. The court framed three issues and held: there was no disclosed pending Githongo suit; the ELC has jurisdiction under section 13 of the ELC Act, section 101 of the Land Registration Act and sections 128 and 150 of the Land Act to determine contracts for sale of land; and consolidation into the ELC better served the interests of justice given the progress already made, including a scene visit and compliance with Order 11. The application dated 16.11.2020 was allowed; the application dated 26.2.2021 and the preliminary objection were dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs; the lower court file was ordered availed within 14 days for consolidation, with paginated bundles within 60 days and a hearing date before court 1 on 14.6.2022.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELC over contracts for sale of land

Holding

The ELC has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes involving contracts for sale of land, including specific performance.

Reasoning

The court interpreted section 13 of the ELC Act and sections 101 of the Land Registration Act and 128 and 150 of the Land Act, holding that the statutory grant of jurisdiction over environment and land disputes covers contractual claims relating to land. Counsel's submission that Article 162(2) confines the ELC to non-commercial disputes was rejected as a misinterpretation of the law as it now exists.

p. 6
02

Transfer or consolidation of the suits

Holding

The proper course was to consolidate Meru CMCC No. 194 of 2018 into this ELC suit rather than transfer the ELC suit to Githongo.

Reasoning

The court considered the balance of convenience, expense, interest of justice and hardship. The ELC file had substantially complied with Order 11, a scene visit had been undertaken and a report filed, and the interested parties had voluntarily enjoined themselves earlier without objecting to jurisdiction. Transferring would cause the parties to start afresh and delay expeditious disposal.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • The ELC is vested with jurisdiction to hear and determine matters relating to contracts on sale of land.
  • The ELC has power to order transfer and consolidation of suits where there are common questions of law or fact and it serves the interest of justice.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated November 16, 2020 is allowed
  2. 2.The application dated 26.2.2021 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs
  3. 3.The preliminary objection dated March 2, 2021 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs
  4. 4.The Meru CMCC No. 194 of 2018 lower court file shall be availed before this court within 14 days from the date hereof for consolidation and disposal
  5. 5.Parties to file paginated bundles within 60 days from the date hereof and thereafter to appear for taking a hearing date before court 1 on 14.6.2022

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13
  • Land Registration Act 2012Section 101
  • Land Act (revised edition 2020)Sections 128 and 150
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 18
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11 rule 3(1)(h); Order 19 rule 3

Cases cited (4)

  • Charles Murugu Mukindia & 2 others vs Consolidated Bank of Kenya Ltd and another
    (2022) eKLR
  • Stumberg & another v Potgeiter
    (1970) EA 323
  • LSK vs The Center for Human Rights and Democracy
    petition no. 14 of 2013
  • Kithita Ngeana vs Mwaniki Kisume
    (2018) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution; Section 13 of the ELC Act; Sections 101 Land Registration Act, 128 and 150 Land Act; Section 18 Civil Procedure Act; Order 11 rule 3(1)(h) Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Stanley & another v Mwongera & 5 others; Rutere & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case 151 of 2017) [2022] KEELC 2948 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Meru ELC Case (applications dated 16.11.2020 and 26.2.2021; preliminary objection dated 2.3.2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/2948/eng@2022-05-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.