Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the judgment (appeal against ruling in Meru Chief Magistrate's Court, MERU ELC CASE)· [2022] KEELC 2857 (KLR)

Gikunda (Suing As The Legal Representative Of M’Inoti M’Magiri) v M’Magiri (Sued as the Legal Representative of Magiri Kwambara) & 3 others (Environment and Land Appeal 77 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 2857 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 May 2022
3,056 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that probate cases cannot decide who owns a deceased person's land—trust claims must be heard by the Environment and Land Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant, as legal representative of the estate of M'Inoti M'Magiri Kwambara, sued in the trial court claiming his late father had bought 4 acres in Abothuguchi Mariene which, during land consolidation, was amalgamated into L.R Abothuguchi/Mariene/162 registered in the name of the 1st respondent's father, who allegedly held it in trust. He sought declaratory orders that the 4 acres were held in trust for the estate and did not form part of Meru Succession Cause No. 117 of 2004. The respondents filed a preliminary objection and replying affidavit asserting the suit was res judicata, the trust and ownership issues having been conclusively determined in the succession cause. The trial court struck out the suit and the application for inhibition orders as res judicata. On first appeal, C.K. Nzili J framed four issues: whether the preliminary objection was a pure point of law, whether the suit was res judicata, the respective jurisdictions of the ELC and the Probate Court, and costs. Applying Mukhisa Biscuits and Oraro v Mbaja, the court held the preliminary objection was not a pure point of law since it required evidence, and the proceedings and pleadings from the succession cause had not been availed to the trial court. Relying on authorities including Musyoka J's decisions, the court held the Probate Court's mandate under the Law of Succession Act does not extend to determining ownership of property or declaration of trusts, such claims being reserved for the ELC under Article 162(2)(b). Since the Probate Court had itself directed the trust claim to another forum, there was no finality and thus no res judicata. The appeal was allowed with costs to the appellant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection on res judicata was a pure point of law

Holding

It was not; it required evidence and facts to establish

Reasoning

Relying on Mukhisa Biscuits and Oraro v Mbaja, the court found the preliminary objection required the trial court to compare pleadings, proceedings and judgment in the succession cause, materials which were never availed. A preliminary objection founded on res judicata that requires ascertainment of facts and prior pleadings is not a pure point of law.

p. 6
02

Whether the suit was res judicata

Holding

No; the probate proceedings did not conclusively determine the trust and land claims

Reasoning

Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act requires identity of issues, parties, title and finality of the previous suit. The pleadings, proceedings and documents in the succession cause were not availed to the trial court. The Probate Court itself found the trust and consolidation claims required succinct evidence in another forum, so there was no finality and no res judicata.

p. 5
03

Jurisdiction of the ELC vis a vis the High Court over land of a deceased person

Holding

The ELC has jurisdiction over trust and ownership disputes concerning registered land even where a deceased's estate is involved; the Probate Court's mandate is limited

Reasoning

Under Article 162(2)(b) and the Environment and Land Court Act, the ELC covers disputes touching on land. Musyoka J's authorities hold the Probate Court does not determine ownership or trusts, such claims by and against third parties being resolved under the Civil Procedure Act, and the Probate Court becomes functus officio after confirmation of grant.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • The jurisdiction of the Probate Court under the Law of Succession Act is limited and does not extend to determining issues of ownership of property and declaration of trusts
  • A preliminary objection must be a pure point of law, not one dependent on evidence and facts
  • A suit is not res judicata where the previous proceedings did not conclusively determine the issues, since trusts and land ownership fall outside the probate framework

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is allowed
  2. 2.Costs of the appeal to the appellant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13
  • Magistrates Court Act 2015Section 9(a)
  • Law of Succession ActCap 160
  • Probate and Administration RulesNot specified

Cases cited (25)

  • Machakos Golf Club Ltd vs Machakos Teachers College & another
    (2021) eKLR
  • IEBC vs Jane Cheperenger & 2 others
    (2015)
  • Joyce Cherop Kaspandoy and 609 others vs Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd
    (2019) eKLR
  • Re estate of Chepsongok Tapsambu (deceased)
    (2021) eKLR
  • KCB Ltd vs Muiri Cofiee Tea Estate Ltd & another
  • Re-estate of Samuel Kathieri deceased
    (2019) eKLR
  • Jasbir Singh Rai & 3 others vs Tarlochan Singh Rai & 4 others
    (2014) eKLR
  • Corla Jackson vs Gmac Mortgage Corporation El AL
  • Nicholas Njeru vs Attorney General & 8 others
    (2013) eKLR
  • Selle & another vs Associated Motor Boat Co. Ltd & others
    1968 E.A 123
  • Mukhisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs West End Distributors Ltd
    (1964) EA 696
  • Bernard Mugo Ndegwa vs James Nderitu Githae & 20 others
    (2010) eKLR
  • E.T vs A.G & another
    (2012) eKLR
  • D.T Dobie & Co. (K) Ltd vs Joseph Mbaria Muchina & another
    (1980) eKLR
  • Republic vs Karisa Chengo and 2 others
    (2017) eKLR
  • Re-estate of Stanley Mathenge Ruriga (deceased)
    2018 eKLR
  • John Mbua Muhtoni & another vs Ruth Muthoni Kariuki
    (2017) eKLR
  • Joseph Kaberia Kumar vs Tony Mwenda Muthaura
    (2021) eKLR
  • Re- Estate of M'Mrurianki M'Mugwika (deceased)
    (2019) eKLR
  • Joseph Koori Ngugi vs Stephen Ndichu J, Makima
    (2017) eKLR
  • re estate of Julius Ndubi Javan (deceased)
    (2018) eKLR
  • Re Estate of Mbai Wainaina (deceased)
  • Meru Succession Case No. 117/2004
  • Re estate of Alice Mumbua Mutua deceased
    (2017) eKLR
  • Oraro vs Mbaja
    (2005) eKLR
On appeal from
Trial court (magistrates' court, Meru)
Not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act; first appellate jurisdiction over the trial court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gikunda (Suing As The Legal Representative Of M’Inoti M’Magiri) v M’Magiri (Sued as the Legal Representative of Magiri Kwambara) & 3 others (Environment and Land Appeal 77 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 2857 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment (appeal against ruling in Meru Chief Magistrate's Court, MERU ELC CASE). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/2857/eng@2022-05-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.