Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Petition (Mombasa); Notice of Motion dated March 17, 2022· [2022] KEELC 2562 (KLR)

Kahia Transporters Limited v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Lands & Physical Planning & 4 others; Lola & 227 others (Proposed Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Constitutional Petition 11 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 2562 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
18 July 2022
17,909 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~72 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Mombasa court joined 228 landowners to a land petition but refused to cancel earlier orders, confirming completed land adjudication in Kenya can only be challenged by judicial review.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This judgment of the Environment and Land Court at Mombasa (Naikuni J, dated July 18, 2022) determines a Notice of Motion dated March 17, 2022 by 228 proposed interested parties who sought to be enjoined in a land petition brought by Osman Ahmed Kahia concerning land in the Maji ya Chumvi Adjudication Section, Kwale. The applicants also sought suspension, setting aside and a declaration of nullity of the ex parte conservatory orders granted on March 15, 2022, alleging fraud, forgery of the Petitioner's title (CR 72836), forum shopping, and violation of their right to be heard. The 4th Respondent supported the application, stating the adjudication process was complete, a Certificate of Finality had issued in November 2018, and titles had already been issued, rendering the orders overtaken by events. Framing four issues, the court held: (i) the applicants met the Muruatetu threshold for joinder, having a proximate, identifiable proprietary stake and real prejudice if excluded; (ii) the prayers for stay, setting aside and nullification were prematurely sought by strangers without locus standi before joinder, and in any event no review ground existed; (iii) the ELC has jurisdiction over the broad issues but not to re-open the concluded adjudication, which is governed by the Land Adjudication Act's internal dispute mechanisms culminating in section 29 appeals to the Minister, subject only to judicial review; and (iv) costs should be in the cause. The court joined the 228 persons as interested parties, directed amendment and service, fixed the matter for priority hearing, and declined to disturb the March 15, 2022 orders.

Key legal issues

#
01

Joinder of interested parties

Holding

The 228 proposed interested parties met the Muruatetu threshold: identifiable stake, real prejudice if denied joinder, and a distinct case; they were granted leave to be enjoined

Reasoning

The court reviewed the definitions in the Mutunga Rules, the Supreme Court Act and Supreme Court Rules, the principles in Njau Kingori, Mumo Matemo and Muruatetu, and found the applicants hold title interests over the suit parcels which would be directly affected by the Petition. Their joinder serves natural justice and complete adjudication, and the Petitioner demonstrated no prejudice.

p. 23
02

Setting aside/review of the ex parte orders of March 15, 2022

Holding

Refused; the prayers were prematurely sought by persons not yet parties and no review ground was made out

Reasoning

The court held that until leave to be joined is granted, the applicants lacked locus standi to seek review, setting aside or suspension. Even assuming competence, no discovery of new matter, error apparent on the face of the record or sufficient reason existed under Section 80 CPA and Order 45, and the court cannot sit as an appellate organ over its own orders.

p. 25
03

Jurisdiction over concluded land adjudication matters

Holding

The ELC has jurisdiction over the broad land issues but not to re-open the concluded adjudication process, which is governed by the Land Adjudication Act's dispute mechanisms and section 29 finality

Reasoning

Applying Lillian S and Karisa Chengo, the court confirmed the ELC's constitutional jurisdiction, but held that adjudication disputes fall within the Land Adjudication Act's internal mechanisms, culminating in appeals to the Minister whose order is final, subject only to judicial review. The adjudication was complete and titles issued, so orders touching it would be granted in vain.

p. 27

Legal principles established

#
  • A proposed interested party must first obtain leave before making further applications; until joined, they are a stranger without locus standi
  • The court will not interfere with a concluded land adjudication process, save through judicial review where the process was conducted capriciously, unfairly or in bad faith
  • A court cannot grant orders in vain where the process before it has been overtaken by events

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the broad issues of the Petition which are not on the Land Adjudication process of Maji ya Chumvi Adjudication Section
  2. 2.Order declining to set aside, vary or review the orders of March 15, 2022, the application on that aspect lacking merit; the Petition was properly instituted
  3. 3.228 adversely affected persons joined as parties in the Petition; Petitioner granted 14 days to amend the main Petition
  4. 4.Petitioner directed to serve the Interested Parties with all pleadings filed in the suit within 14 days
  5. 5.Matter to be heard on priority basis by affidavits and viva voce evidence on October 6, 2022; parties granted 21 days to file further documents
  6. 6.Costs of the application to be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 2(4), 3, 10, 25(c), 40, 48, 50(1)&(2), 61, 62, 63, 67, 159(2)(d), 162(3), 165(5), 258
  • Land Act, 2012Sections 23(2), 160, 161, 162
  • Land Registration ActSections 26(1), 80(1), 108
  • Land Adjudication Act, Cap 284Sections 7, 10-13, 15, 16, 18-22, 26, 29, 30
  • Land Control Act, Cap 302Sections 11 and 13
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21Sections 1A, 1B, 3A, 18(1), 80, 100
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 1 Rule 10(2), Order 10, Order 45(1)
  • Evidence Act, Cap 80Sections 107, 108, 109
  • Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013 (Mutunga Rules)Rules 2 and 7
  • Supreme Court Act, No. 7 of 2011Section 23
  • Supreme Court Rules, 2012Rule 25
  • Legal Notice No. 170 of 1972application of Land Adjudication Act to Kwale Trust land
  • Legal Notice No. 262 of 2021 (Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 234 of 31st December 2021)reminder on section 23(2) Land Act powers
  • Legal Notice No. 106 of 2019revoked notice

Cases cited (29)

  • Jose Estates Limited v Muthumu Farm Limited & 2 others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Shanzu Investment Limited v Commissioner of Lands
    (1993) eKLR
  • Jennifer Nyambura Kamau v Humphrey Mbaka Nandi
    (2013) eKLR
  • Equity Bank of Kenya & Another v Chief Land Registrar & Another
    [2018] eKLR
  • Mary Ruguru Njoroge v Samuel Gachuma Mbugua & 4 others
    (2014) eKLR
  • David Peterson Kiengo & 2 others v Kariuki Thuo
    [2012] eKLR
  • Mohansons (Kenya) Limited v Registrar of Titles & 2 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Jonah Omoyama v Bonface Oure & 2 others
    [2021] eKLR
  • Victoria Katuku (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Eunice Mueni Muthamba v Jessinkay Enterprises & 2 Others
    [2017] eKLR
  • David Kabungu v Zikarenga & 4 others
    Kampala HCCS No. 36 of 1995
  • Party of Independent Candidate of Kenya & Another v Mutula Kilonzo & 2 others
    (2013) eKLR
  • Levben Products v Alexander Films (SA) (PTY) Ltd
    1957 (4) SA 225 (SR) at 227
  • Leonard Kimeu Mwanthi v Rukaria M'twerandu M'iringu; Nathaniel Kithinji Ikiugu & 4 others (Intended Interested Parties)
    [2021] eKLR
  • Central Kenya Ltd v Trust Bank & 4 others
    CA No. 222 of 1998
  • Telkom Kenya Limited v John Ochanda (suing on his own behalf and on behalf of 996 former employees of Telkom Kenya Limited)
    (2014) eKLR
  • Judicial Service Commission v Speaker of the National Assembly & another
    [2013] eKLR
  • Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemo & 5 others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Joseph Njau Kingori v Robert Maina Chege & 3 others
    [2002] eKLR
  • Baluram v P. Chellathangam & Ors
    10 December 2014
  • Moses Wachira v Niels Bruel & 2 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Communications Commission of Kenya and 4 others v Media Services Limited & 7 others
    Petition No. 15 of 2014
  • Meme v Republic
    [2004] 1 EA 124
  • Francis Karioki Muruatetu & Another v Republic & 5 others
    Petition 15 as consolidated with 16 of 2013 [2016] eKLR
  • JMK v MWM & another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Temple Point Resort Limited v Accredo A G & 5 others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Ajit Kumar Rath v State of Orisa
    9 Supreme Court Cases 596 at Page 608
  • Nyamongo & Nyamongo v Kogo
    (2001) EA 170
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
    (1989) KLR 1
  • Republic v Karisa Chengo & 2 others
    Supreme Court Petition No. 5 of 2015 [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 258 and 162(3) of the Constitution; Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kahia Transporters Limited v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Lands & Physical Planning & 4 others; Lola & 227 others (Proposed Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Constitutional Petition 11 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 2562 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC Petition (Mombasa); Notice of Motion dated March 17, 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/2562/eng@2022-07-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.