Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially Allowed· [2022] KEELC 2559 (KLR)

Adongo v Odhiambo & 3 others (Environment & Land Case E6 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 2559 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
15 July 2022
469 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an interlocutory ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kisumu in an adverse possession claim by Albert Odhiambo Adoyo against Ndinya Andiego Odhiambo and the Chairman, B.O.M of AIC Olago Aluoch Girls Secondary School, concerning land parcel Kisumu/Nyahera/2260 (originally part of Kisumu/Nyahera/1116, subdivided into 2258, 2259 and 2260). The plaintiff claimed his late mother purchased the property in 1988 from Achunge Andiego and that he has resided on parcel 2260 since then. He sought an interim injunction restraining the respondents from evicting him and his family and an order maintaining the status quo. Applying the established interlocutory injunction criteria, the court found a prima facie case with a likelihood of success, since the plaintiff has resided on the land since 1988, more than 20 years, giving him an arguable interest. It further found that eviction would cause irreparable harm affecting his entire family, and that the balance of convenience favoured the plaintiff, who would be forced out of his home. The application was allowed: an interim injunction was granted restraining the respondents, their agents and servants from evicting the plaintiff and his family from Kisumu/Nyahera/2260 pending the hearing and determination of the suit, with costs of the application in the cause. The ruling was delivered electronically pursuant to COVID-19 pandemic directions issued by the Chief Justice on 15th March 2020.

Key legal issues

#
01

Prima facie case with a likelihood of success

Holding

Established, as the plaintiff has resided on the land since 1988, over 20 years, giving him an arguable interest

Reasoning

The court considered the pleadings, affidavits and submissions, and found that continuous occupation since 1988 for more than 20 years gives the plaintiff an arguable interest in the parcel, satisfying the prima facie case threshold for interlocutory relief in his adverse possession claim.

p. 2
02

Irreparable damage not compensable in damages

Holding

Established; eviction would irreparably affect the plaintiff and his entire family as he would be forced to vacate his home

Reasoning

The court found that eviction would cause harm beyond monetary compensation because the plaintiff resides on the suit land with his family, and forced vacation of his home would affect the entire family, meeting the second Giella-type threshold for an interlocutory injunction.

p. 2
03

Balance of convenience

Holding

Tilts in favour of the plaintiff, who would be more inconvenienced by being forced out of his home

Reasoning

The court held that the plaintiff would suffer greater inconvenience than the defendants if the injunction were withheld, as he would be forced out of his home, completing the three-limb test for interlocutory injunctive relief and justifying the orders granted.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Long residence on land for over 20 years constitutes an arguable interest sufficient to establish a prima facie case for interim injunctive relief in a pending adverse possession claim

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of interim injunction restraining the Respondents, their servants, agents, workers, proxies, representatives and/or any other person assigned or with their authority from evicting the Applicant and his family from Kisumu/Nyahera/2260 and interfering with the land parcel, pending the hearing and determination of the suit
  2. 2.Costs of the application to be in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over disputes relating to land; adverse possession claim in respect of Kisumu/Nyahera/2260

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Adongo v Odhiambo & 3 others (Environment & Land Case E6 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 2559 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/2559/eng@2022-07-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.