Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (Originating Summons dated 17th February 2021)· [2022] KEELC 2473 (KLR)

Kingori & another (Suing as the Administrators of the Estate of Paul Kingori Mbeya –Deceased) v Mwangi & 3 others (Being sued as the Administrators of the Estate of Mwangi Kirung'o Kahama alias James Mwangi Kirung'o - Deceased) (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 9 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 2473 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya (Environment and Land jurisdiction), Eldoret
14 July 2022
1,852 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that a 1986 land sale still binds a deceased seller's estate, and all co-administrators must sign the transfer documents.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a further amended originating summons dated 17th February 2021, the Plaintiffs, administrators of the estate of Paul Kingori Mbeya (died 2006), sought declarations and orders compelling the Defendants, administrators of the estate of Mwangi Kirungo Kahama alias James Mwangi Kirungo (died 1997), to effect transfer of two properties - LR No. 13052 (original number 11940/1) and Timboroa/Kipkurere Block 1 (Mutarakwa)/364 - which Kirungo had sold to Mbeya in 1986 but never transferred before his death. The Plaintiffs took possession in 1989, developed LR 13052, and Mbeya was buried there. The suit against the 2nd Defendant was withdrawn on 1st November 2021; the 4th and 5th Defendants did not enter appearance but their advocates confirmed in correspondence that the sale occurred and the properties were never part of Kirungo's estate. The 1st and 3rd Defendants opposed, citing the absence of a written sale agreement under section 3(3) of the Law of Contract Act. The court framed three issues: whether the sale occurred, whether the Defendants were obliged to sign transfers, and costs. It held the sale was proved, noting section 3(3)'s requirements were introduced only in 2003 and could not apply to a 1986 sale. Relying on In Re Estate of Makokha Idris Khasabuli, it held all co-administrators must act as one corporate body and were obliged to sign the transfer documents. The Plaintiffs abandoned prayer 3. Judgment was entered in terms of prayers 1, 2(a), 2(b), 4 and 5, with costs to the Plaintiffs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the sale of the suit properties by Kirungo to Mbeya was proved

Holding

The sale was proved; the 4th and 5th Defendants (co-administrators) acknowledged it in correspondence, and the properties were excluded from the estate inventory. The section 3(3) Law of Contract Act writing/witnessing requirement (introduced in 2003) does not apply to a 1986 sale.

Reasoning

Correspondence from Harit Sheth Advocates and Waweru Gatonye & Co. Advocates confirmed that Kirungo sold the properties to Mbeya and that the 4th and 5th Defendants were willing to sign transfer forms. Possession by the Plaintiffs for over three decades, extensive development, and Mbeya's interment on the land corroborated the sale. The statutory writing requirement post-dated the sale, and the 1st and 3rd Defendants, who conceded their brothers knew of the sale, could not resile from it.

p. 4
02

Whether the Defendants are legally obligated to sign transfer documents

Holding

All four co-administrators are jointly obligated to sign the necessary documents to effect the transfer.

Reasoning

Relying on In Re Estate of Makokha Idris Khasabuli (Deceased), administrators must act as one corporate body and none may administer the estate to the exclusion of others. The 1st and 3rd Defendants could not escape their responsibility by alleging exclusion from the estate's affairs by their brothers; having accepted appointment as co-administrators, they must do all that is required of them, including signing the transfer documents specified in the originating summons.

p. 4
03

Costs

Holding

Costs awarded to the Plaintiffs as the successful party.

Reasoning

Costs follow the event. The matter should not have gone to full trial; the 1st and 3rd Defendants prolonged it by playing hard ball out of selfish interest arising from their differences with the 4th and 5th Defendants. The compensatory rationale of the costs principle favoured awarding costs to the successful Plaintiffs.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Co-administrators of a deceased's estate are obliged to administer the estate as one corporate body and cannot decline to perform their duties on the ground that they have been excluded by other administrators
  • Costs follow the event; the principle compensates the successful party rather than penalising the losing party

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered against the Defendants in terms of prayers (1), 2(a), 2(b), (4) and (5) of the further amended originating summons dated 17th February 2021
  2. 2.The Defendants, as joint administrators of the estate of Kirungo, declared under legal obligation to transact in LR No. 13052 (original number 11940/1) and Timboroa/Kipkurere Block 1 (Mutarakwa)/364
  3. 3.Registration of transfer of the titles to Salome Njeri Kingori and Joseph Njau Kingori as specified in the originating summons
  4. 4.Rectification/amendment of the land registers to reflect Salome Njeri Kingori (and Joseph Njau Kingori for Block 1 (Mutarakwa)/364) as registered proprietors
  5. 5.Plaintiffs' prayer 3 abandoned (execution of documents by the Deputy Registrar) - judgment not granted on that prayer
  6. 6.The Defendants to pay costs to the Plaintiffs
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the High Court over the estate-related land claim; no specific constitutional/statutory basis invoked in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kingori & another (Suing as the Administrators of the Estate of Paul Kingori Mbeya –Deceased) v Mwangi & 3 others (Being sued as the Administrators of the Estate of Mwangi Kirung'o Kahama alias James Mwangi Kirung'o - Deceased) (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 9 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 2473 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment (Originating Summons dated 17th February 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/2473/eng@2022-07-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.