Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedPetition dated September 27, 2021 (E&L Petition, Nairobi)· [2022] KEELC 2326 (KLR)

Idow Trading Company Limited v National Land Commission & 2 others; County Government of Nairobi & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Petition E035 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 2326 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
21 June 2022
4,817 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~19 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court quashed the National Land Commission's revocation of a land title because the owner was never given a fair hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Idow Trading Company Limited, the registered lessee of LR No. 36/1/1034, Eastleigh, petitioned the Environment and Land Court after learning, in the course of ELC Case No. 63 of 2008, that the National Land Commission had on April 28, 2017 decided to revoke its title, a decision gazetted on July 17, 2017 vesting the land in the National and County Governments. The Petitioner asserted it was never served with notice of the review proceedings and thus lost its property without a hearing, contrary to Articles 47 and 50(1) of the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Action Act. The NLC did not respond; the 2nd and 3rd Respondents filed grounds of opposition asserting NLC's power under Article 68(c)(v) and section 14 of the NLC Act; the 1st Interested Party (Nairobi City County) raised constitutional exhaustion/avoidance; the 2nd Interested Party (occupier under a Temporary Occupation Licence) supported the petition. The court framed four issues and held: (1) the NLC had jurisdiction, since it may review grants of former public land; (2) and (3) the Petitioner was not invited to, or present at, the review hearing and gazette-notice service was inadequate notice, breaching natural justice, Articles 47 and 50 and section 14(3) of the NLC Act; (4) the lease generated a legitimate expectation of valid title, and no breach of lease conditions was proved. The petition was allowed entirely in terms of prayers (a) to (e): the revocation was declared void, quashed, and costs awarded to the Petitioner.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the NLC over leasehold title originally allocated from public land

Holding

NLC had jurisdiction; the suit land was public land before allotment and section 14 NLCA permits review of such grants

Reasoning

Section 14(1) of the National Land Commission Act empowers the Commission to review grants of public land. The suit land was originally government land, and the Commission may probe the process of conversion to private land. Only private-to-private transactions fall outside its mandate, relying on the Olow case and the Supreme Court advisory reference.

p. 5
02

Whether the Petitioner was accorded fair administrative action and fair hearing

Holding

No - the Petitioner was not invited to or present at the review hearing; Articles 47 and 50 and section 14(3) NLCA were violated

Reasoning

The NLC proceedings of April 28, 2017 record that the Petitioner, the registered owner, was absent and this was noted by the 2nd Interested Party's advocate. The NLC took no steps to remedy this. Failure to serve a hearing notice required by section 14(3) NLCA breached natural justice, and service by gazette notice alone was inadequate notice.

p. 6
03

Constitutional exhaustion/avoidance objection raised by 1st Interested Party

Holding

Rejected; the uncontroverted violation could not stand and the orders were merited

Reasoning

The doctrine of constitutional avoidance was invoked because two ELC suits existed. The court held the Petitioner only learned of the revocation in separate court proceedings, never having been served even with the revocation order, so the process leading to the impugned decision was itself flawed and the objection did not defeat the petition.

p. 8
04

Legitimate expectation and validity of the Petitioner's title

Holding

The lease issued by the Government gave rise to a legitimate expectation of a valid title; no evidence of reversion or breach of lease conditions

Reasoning

The lease document contained conditions for reversion to the Government, none of which was proved breached. The lease was issued for commercial purposes, so the land was never effectively public land at the material time, and the Petitioner is the registered owner entitled to all rights over the property.

p. 9

Legal principles established

#
  • A statutory body making a decision affecting a person's rights must accord that person a hearing; service by gazette notice alone is not adequate notice where the affected party's interest is known
  • The NLC has jurisdiction under section 14 of the National Land Commission Act to review grants of public land even where the land is now registered as private property, but must follow due process

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the decision of the 1st respondent delivered on April 28, 2017 and published in the Kenya Gazette Notice of July 17, 2017 pertaining to LR No. 36/1/1034 was irregular, illegal, unlawful and void
  2. 2.A declaration that the Petitioner's right to fair administrative action under Article 47 of the Constitution was violated
  3. 3.A declaration that the Petitioner's right to a fair hearing under Article 50(1) of the Constitution was violated
  4. 4.The decision of the 1st Respondent revoking and nullifying the title to LR No 36/1/1034 quashed
  5. 5.Costs of the petition awarded to the Petitioner
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 47, 50(1) and 165 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010; Environment and Land Court Act jurisdiction over constitutional petitions concerning land

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Idow Trading Company Limited v National Land Commission & 2 others; County Government of Nairobi & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Petition E035 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 2326 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Petition dated September 27, 2021 (E&L Petition, Nairobi). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/2326/eng@2022-06-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.