Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedApplication dated 9th May 2022 (suit dismissed on 17th April 2018)· [2022] KEELC 2253 (KLR)

Notice of Motion to discharge orders of inhibition and injunction following dismissal of suit (2nd defendant/applicant v plaintiff/respondent)

Environment and Land Court
6 July 2022
308 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Once a Kenyan court dismisses a lawsuit, temporary orders blocking land deals—like injunctions and inhibitions—automatically lose their force and can be discharged.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a Notice of Motion dated 9th May 2022 by the 2nd defendant seeking discharge and/or setting aside of orders of inhibition and injunction issued by the Environment and Land Court at Meru on 14th October 2014 pending hearing and determination of the suit. The applicant, through the supporting affidavit of Joseph Kinyuru Thuranira sworn on 10th May 2022, argued that the suit had been dismissed on 17th April 2018 by Mbugua J under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules for want of prosecution, and that consequently there was no basis for the interlocutory orders to remain in force. Although the plaintiff/respondent was duly served through the firm of M/s Otieno & Co Advocates, no response was filed. C.K Yano J agreed that with the suit dismissed on 17th April 2018, there was no basis for the orders of inhibition and injunction to remain in force. The court found the 2nd defendant's application merited, allowed it, and made no order as to costs. The judgment was delivered in open court at Meru on 6th July 2022, with Ms Gachohi holding brief for Mutuma for the plaintiff and no appearance for the defendants.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether interlocutory orders of inhibition and injunction survive the dismissal of the substantive suit

Holding

They do not survive; they must be discharged once the suit is dismissed

Reasoning

The orders of inhibition and injunction were granted on 14th October 2014 pending hearing and determination of the suit. The suit was dismissed on 17th April 2018 by Mbugua J under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules for want of prosecution after notice to the parties. Since the orders were incidental to the suit and its determination, no basis remained for them to continue in force once the suit had been dismissed.

p. 1
02

Whether an unopposed application served on the respondent should be allowed

Holding

Yes; the respondent was duly served but filed no response, and the application was found merited

Reasoning

Although the respondent's advocates (M/s Otieno & Co Advocates) were duly served, no response was filed. The court proceeded to determine the application on the material before it, agreeing with the applicant that the dismissal of the suit removed the foundation for the interlocutory orders.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Interlocutory orders such as inhibition and injunction granted pending hearing and determination of a suit lapse and cannot remain in force once the suit has been dismissed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 2nd defendant's application dated 9th May 2022 is allowed
  2. 2.The orders of inhibition and injunction granted on 14th October 2014 are discharged/set aside
  3. 3.No order as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction of the court over its interlocutory orders following dismissal of the suit under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Notice of Motion to discharge orders of inhibition and injunction following dismissal of suit (2nd defendant/applicant v plaintiff/respondent)", Case Analysis (2022). Application dated 9th May 2022 (suit dismissed on 17th April 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/2253/eng@2022-07-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.