Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Appeal (undated 5-paragraph Memorandum of Appeal, Kerugoya)· [2022] KEELC 1876 (KLR)

Nancy Wangari Kinyua v Rose Wambui & another [2022] KEELC 1876 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
21 January 2022
1,842 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court threw out a land appeal because the memorandum of appeal was unsigned and the issues had already been decided.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an appeal to the Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya against the judgment of Senior Principal Magistrate H.N. Ndung'u in SPMCC No. 267 of 2010 delivered on 19th January 2012, in a dispute over land parcel No. Mwerua/Gitaku/827. The appellant sought subdivision of the jointly registered parcel into three equal portions, but the lower court found she had sold her share. Her earlier appeal (ELCA No. 48 of 2014) was dismissed on 19th May 2017; subsequent applications before the magistrates' court, including one seeking removal of her name from the title and her own application for review dated 24th October 2017, produced conflicting outcomes. The appeal was disposed of by written submissions. The respondents argued the memorandum of appeal was undated, unsigned and at variance with the relief sought, and that any second review was barred by Order 45 Rule 6. The court agreed, holding that the unsigned memorandum rendered the appeal incompetent under Order 42 Rule 1, and that in any event the 2012 judgment had already been litigated and dismissed in ELCA No. 48 of 2014, while a second review application was expressly barred. The court dismissed the appeal with costs to the respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competency of the memorandum of appeal

Holding

The appeal was incompetent because the memorandum of appeal was undated and unsigned, contrary to Order 42 Rule 1(1) and (2).

Reasoning

Order 42 Rule 1(1) requires every appeal to the High Court to be in the form of a memorandum of appeal signed as a pleading. The memorandum at page 5 of the record was not signed. The appellant had the opportunity to amend the record when directions were taken but did not do so. This defect alone was sufficient to render the appeal incompetent.

p. 3
02

Ambiguity as to the decision appealed against

Holding

The record disclosed two potential impugned decisions (the 2012 judgment of H.N. Ndung'u and the ruling of S.M.S Soita), creating confusion; the grounds did not match the relief sought.

Reasoning

The five grounds of the memorandum challenged the 2012 judgment, yet the leave granted by the court related to the magistrate's later ruling. The respondent argued there was no memorandum against the decision of Hon. Soita. The court found the memorandum was at variance with what the appellant was actually seeking, compounding the incompetence.

p. 2
03

Whether the appeal could succeed on its merits

Holding

Even if competent, the appeal would fail: the 2012 judgment was already the subject of ELCA No. 48 of 2014, dismissed on 19/05/2017, and the second review application was barred by Order 45 Rule 6.

Reasoning

The judgment of 19/01/2012 had already been challenged in ELCA No. 48 of 2014 and dismissed by this court. The appellant's application dated 24/10/2017 sought a review of an order that had itself been made on a review, which Order 45 Rule 6 prohibits. The appeal therefore had no merit independently of its procedural defects.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal to the High Court must be instituted by a memorandum of appeal signed in the same manner as a pleading; an unsigned memorandum renders the appeal incompetent.
  • No court may entertain an application to review an order made on an application for review; review can be sought only once.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the appeal awarded to the respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 1(1) and (2)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 45 Rule 6
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 1(2) & (4)
On appeal from
Senior Principal Magistrate's Court, Kerugoya
SPMCC No. 267 of 2010
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the High Court/ELC under Order 42 of the Civil Procedure Rules against the judgment in SPMCC No. 267 of 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nancy Wangari Kinyua v Rose Wambui & another [2022] KEELC 1876 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC Appeal (undated 5-paragraph Memorandum of Appeal, Kerugoya). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1876/eng@2022-01-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.