Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 17th September, 2021· [2022] KEELC 1786 (KLR)

Akide and Company Advocates v Registered Trustees of the Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme [2022] KEELC 1786 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
3 February 2022
775 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan advocate recovered Ksh 7.5 million in taxed costs as judgment, but lost his 14% interest claim because he never demanded interest in writing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, Kenneth Wabwire Akide S.C, brought a Notice of Motion dated 17th September 2021 under Section 51 of the Advocates Act seeking to have the Certificate of Taxation dated 30th August 2021 deemed as judgment and decree, and judgment entered against the Respondent for Kshs. 7,555,279.60/- with interest at 14% per annum under Regulation 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order from one month after demand until payment in full. The Applicant had been instructed to oversee the consolidation and registration of a single deed plan for L.R No. 209/12178 (part), and his advocate bill of costs was taxed on 19th August 2021. The application was unopposed; an affidavit of service sworn by Jairus Nduru confirmed the Respondent was duly served. The Court found the sole issue to be whether the application was merited. Relying on Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the Court held that since the Respondent was properly served and did not dispute the Certificate of Taxation, judgment would be entered for the taxed costs. However, on interest, the Court held that Regulation 7 requires both lapse of one month from delivery of the bill and an express claim for interest before payment or tender in full; as annexure KWA-5, the demand for settlement, contained no demand for interest, interest was declined. On costs, the Court exercised its discretion and, the Respondent having not resisted, directed each party to bear its own costs. The application was accordingly allowed in part, with judgment entered for Ksh 7,555,276.60/= as per the final orders.

Key legal issues

#
01

Entry of judgment on a certificate of taxation under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act

Holding

Judgment was entered for the taxed costs as the Respondent was duly served and did not dispute the Certificate of Taxation

Reasoning

Section 51(2) provides that a taxing officer's certificate is final as to the amount of costs unless set aside or altered by the Court, and the Court may order judgment to be entered for the sum certified where the retainer is not disputed. The Respondent was properly served with the application and affidavit of service confirmed this, yet did not oppose or dispute the Certificate of Taxation dated 30th August 2021, so judgment was properly entered.

p. 1
02

Entitlement to interest at 14% per annum under Regulation 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order

Holding

Interest was declined because there was no evidence a claim for interest was raised as the regulation requires

Reasoning

Regulation 7 permits an advocate to charge interest at 14% per annum on disbursements and costs from the expiration of one month from delivery of the bill, provided the claim for interest is raised before the bill is paid or tendered in full. The Court found the regulation requires not only service of the bill but a demand for interest. The demand for settlement of taxed costs (annexure KWA-5) contained no demand for interest, so no award of interest could be made.

p. 1
03

Costs of the application

Holding

Each party to bear its own costs, given the Respondent did not resist the application

Reasoning

The Court exercised its discretion on costs by considering the outcome and the circumstances of the case. Since the Respondent did not resist the application, the Court directed each party to bear its own costs of the proceedings.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An unchallenged certificate of taxation is final as to the amount of costs and judgment may be entered for the certified sum where the retainer is not disputed
  • Interest under Regulation 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order requires that one month elapse from delivery of the bill AND that a claim for interest be raised before payment or tender in full

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment be entered in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent for Ksh 7,555,276.60/=.
  2. 2.The claim for interest is declined.
  3. 3.Each party to bear its own costs of the application.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 51(2)
  • Advocates (Remuneration) OrderRegulation 7
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51 of the Advocates Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Akide and Company Advocates v Registered Trustees of the Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme [2022] KEELC 1786 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Notice of Motion dated 17th September, 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1786/eng@2022-02-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.