Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutPetition No. E012 of 2021 (Notice of Motion dated 12th August 2021), Machakos· [2022] KEELC 1432 (KLR)

Joyce Kilonzo & 3 others v National Land Commission & another [2022] KEELC 1432 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 February 2022
3,440 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck down an injunction against compulsory acquisition, ruling landowners must first present ownership claims to the National Land Commission's inquiry before going to court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The four Petitioners, registered or beneficial owners of plots carved out of Parcel L.R. No. 11161 which they purchased from the 2nd Respondent, a land buying company, moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated 12th August 2021 seeking to suspend and restrain compulsory acquisition of the land pursuant to Gazette Notice No. 4392 of 6th May 2021, published by the 1st Respondent for the Machakos Water Supply Project. They argued the Gazette Notice was illegal because it recognised the 2nd Respondent as owner instead of them, violated Articles 40 and 47 of the Constitution and Section 107 of the Land Act (no mapping, valuation or register of occupiers), and contravened status quo orders in Machakos ELC Case No. 64 of 2019. The Respondents did not file a response despite service. The Court framed a single issue: whether the Applicants met the threshold for a temporary injunction under Giella v Cassman Brown and Nguruman. It accepted the Applicants had a prima facie claim but held the Gazette Notice under Section 107(5) is only a preliminary notice of intention to acquire; identifying all interested persons is the function of the National Land Commission's quasi-judicial inquiry under Section 112, in which the Commission has a wide inquisitorial mandate. Citing Patrick Musimba, Diana Kethi Kilonzo and Henry Wainaina Wakihoro, the Court held that injunctions at this preliminary stage would usurp the Commission's statutory mandate and that applicants should first exhaust the Section 112-115 mechanism before coming to court. The application was struck out with no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Petitioners established a prima facie case warranting an interlocutory injunction against compulsory acquisition

Holding

Although the Applicants appeared to have a prima facie claim or interest in the suit land, the injunction could not issue because their claim was premature - the proper forum for determining ownership and compensation claims at this stage is the National Land Commission's inquiry under Section 112 of the Land Act.

Reasoning

The Gazette Notice under Section 107(5) is a preliminary step in compulsory acquisition. The Commission's inquiry under Section 112 has a wide inquisitorial, quasi-judicial mandate to establish all persons interested in the land. Enjoining the process at this preliminary stage would usurp the Commission's statutory powers; aggrieved parties may come to court after the inquiry.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • The jurisdiction to determine the true owners of land intended to be compulsorily acquired, for purposes of awarding compensation, is vested in the National Land Commission under Section 112 of the Land Act; aggrieved persons may move the court only after the Commission's determination.
  • A Gazette Notice of intention to acquire under Section 107(5) of the Land Act is only a preliminary notice, and the Commission is not yet required at that stage to identify all persons in occupation or having interest in the land.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 12th August 2021 is struck out with no orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 23
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 40
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 47
  • Land ActPart VIII; Sections 107, 107(4)(a), 107(4)(b), 107(5), 107(7), 112, 112(5), 115
  • Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013Rule 23
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 Rule 1

Cases cited (11)

  • Giella vs. Cassman Brown Co. Ltd
    [1973] EA 358
  • Mrao Ltd vs. First American Bank of Kenya Ltd & 2 Others
    [2003] eKLR
  • Kenleb Cons Ltd vs. New Gatitu Service Station Ltd & Another
    [1990] eKLR
  • Paul Gitonga Wanjau vs. Gathuthi Tea Factory Company Limited & 2 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Joseph Sire Oromo vs. Housing Finance Company of Kenya
    [2008] eKLR
  • Joel Kipkurui Arap Koech vs. Alice Wambui Magandu & 3 Others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited vs. Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Patrick Musimba vs. National Land Commission & 4 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Diana Kethi Kilonzo vs. IEBC & 2 Others
  • Henry Wainaina Wakihoro & Another vs National Land Commission & 2 Others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another vs. Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 Others
    [2012] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 23 of the Constitution of Kenya and Rule 23 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joyce Kilonzo & 3 others v National Land Commission & another [2022] KEELC 1432 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Petition No. E012 of 2021 (Notice of Motion dated 12th August 2021), Machakos. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1432/eng@2022-02-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.