Family Shade Africa Limited v James Gitau Mukuria & another [2022] KEELC 1384 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court refused to strike out a defence over a disputed auctioned property, confirming that even one genuine triable issue means the case must go to trial.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the defence should be struck out for disclosing no reasonable defence
The defence raises triable issues and should not be struck out; the striking-out jurisdiction is draconian and sparingly exercised
The court reviewed the settled principles from Postal Corporation, Olympic Escort, Co-operative Merchant Bank, Yaya Towers and D.T. Dobie: striking out is a draconian remedy exercised only in plain and exceptional cases. Having perused the defence, including the contention that another suit challenges the legality of the auction sale, the spousal consent issue and compliance with auction rules, the court found bona fide triable issues fit only for trial.
Legal principles established
#- If a defence raises even one bona fide triable issue, the defendant must be given leave to defend
- A triable issue need only be bona fide, not one the defendant would ultimately succeed on
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion dated 9th July 2021 is dismissed
- 2.Costs of the application awarded to the Defendants
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Order 2 rule 15(1)(b), (c) and Order 7 rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Family Shade Africa Limited v James Gitau Mukuria & another [2022] KEELC 1384 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1384/eng@2022-02-15
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.