Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Case No. 15 of 2021· [2022] KEELC 1219 (KLR)

Margaret Njeri Gitau v Julius Mburu Gitau & 2 others [2022] KEELC 1219 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 February 2022
1,431 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Environment and Land Court ruling at Murang'a, delivered by L. Gacheru J on 24th February 2022, determined a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 22nd November 2021 raised by the 1st Defendant in ELC Case No. 15 of 2021. The 1st Defendant contended that the Plaintiff's entire suit was res judicata, the same matters having been litigated in Thika CMCC 257 of 1992, where the Plaintiff's claim for a transfer of 2 acres from L.R No. LOC 4/Kiranga/793 was dismissed, and again in Kandara Land Case No. 1 of 2011; he also relied on an unsettled bill of costs of Kshs. 28,650. The Plaintiff/Respondent opposed, submitting that the former suit was grounded on fraudulent transfer between different parties litigating under different titles, whereas the present suit pleads customary trust and includes a claim as legal representative of the estate of Joyce Njoki Gitau. The court first asked whether what was raised amounted to a true preliminary objection. Applying Mukisa Biscuits, Oraro v Mbaja, Henry Wanyama Khaemba and George Kamau Kimani, it held that because res judicata required probing of disputed facts and the annexed documentary evidence, the objection could not be entertained as a preliminary objection. The objection was dismissed entirely with costs to the Plaintiff/Respondent, with the res judicata issues left for determination at the full trial.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the 1st Defendant's notice of preliminary objection on res judicata amounted to a true preliminary objection

Holding

It did not; the objection required ascertainment of facts and probing of evidence, including the annexed bundle of documents, and was therefore improperly raised as a preliminary objection.

Reasoning

The court applied the Mukisa Biscuits definition that a preliminary objection raises a pure point of law on assumed facts. Because the 1st Defendant disputed the Plaintiff's pleaded facts and sought reliance on a bundle of documents to establish res judicata, determining the objection would require probing evidence, which is outside the limited scope of a preliminary objection.

p. 2
02

Whether the preliminary objection was merited

Holding

Not merited and dismissed entirely with costs to the Plaintiff/Respondent.

Reasoning

Having found that what was raised did not amount to a preliminary objection, the court concluded the objection could not succeed. The res judicata issues raised remain open to be determined in the full hearing of the suit on its merits.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A claim of res judicata requiring probing of evidence cannot be raised by way of preliminary objection
  • A preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law and cannot depend on disputed facts or evidence

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Preliminary Objection is dismissed entirely with costs to the Plaintiff/Respondent
  2. 2.The issues raised by the 1st Defendant/Objector will be considered as the Court determines the merit of the case in totality

Authorities

#

Cases cited (4)

  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co. Ltd…Vs…West End Distributors Ltd
    (1969) EA 696
  • Oraro…Vs…Mbaja
    (2005) 1 KLR 141
  • Henry Wanyama Khaemba…Vs…Standard Chartered Bank Ltd & Another
    (2014) EKLR
  • George Kamau Kimani & 4 Others…Vs…County Government of Trans Nzoia & Another
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Margaret Njeri Gitau v Julius Mburu Gitau & 2 others [2022] KEELC 1219 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC Case No. 15 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1219/eng@2022-02-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.