Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC No. 273 of 2016· [2022] KEELC 1202 (KLR)

Betwell Kiplagat Kosgei v Jackson Chepkwony & another [2022] KEELC 1202 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
24 February 2022
1,001 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Eldoret Environment and Land Court refused to undo a land judgment entered against a defendant who was properly served, delayed, and had no real defence.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Environment and Land Court ruling at Eldoret disposed of a Notice of Motion by the 1st Defendant seeking to set aside an ex parte judgment entered on 23rd June 2020 together with consequential orders, in a suit concerning LR No. Cheptiret/Cheplaskei Block 1 (Kipchamo) 52. The Applicant, registered owner of the suit property, argued he was never served with summons or subsequent court processes and only learned of the case when served with an order, decree and bill of costs. He further asserted a good defence by way of adverse possession. The Plaintiff opposed, contending service was duly effected and the application was misconceived and brought in bad faith. The sole issue framed was whether the Applicant had made out a case for setting aside the ex parte judgment and consequential orders. The court found service proper despite the process server's affidavit not strictly complying with content requirements, since the Applicant's home and identity were identified and he declined to sign the summons. The judgment was thus a regular one. The court declined to exercise its discretion in the Applicant's favour for four reasons: no explanation was given for failing to file a defence; the application came 8 months after judgment; the proposed defence of adverse possession was a sham, being inconsistent with the Applicant's admission that he holds the land in trust for the family of the late Malakwen Arap Rutto, whose son Geoffrey Kosgei was entitled to 9 acres; and the Respondent would be greatly prejudiced by a fresh hearing since the Applicant had already subdivided the land into four portions. The application was dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicant was duly served with summons to enter appearance

Holding

Service was proper despite the process server's affidavit not strictly complying with content requirements, as the Applicant's home and identity were identified and he declined to sign

Reasoning

The court examined the affidavit of service sworn on 10th October 2016. Although the process server did not strictly comply with the requirements as to contents of an affidavit of service, the court found service proper because the Applicant, an uncle of the Respondent, had his home and identity identified, was served in person, and simply ignored the court process.

p. 1
02

Whether the ex parte judgment should be set aside

Holding

The application failed: no explanation for not filing a defence, inordinate delay of 8 months, sham proposed defence of adverse possession inconsistent with admitted trusteeship, and prejudice to the Respondent

Reasoning

The judgment was regular, not ex parte in the sense of no service. Discretion was declined because the Applicant gave no reason for not defending, delayed 8 months, and his proposed counterclaim for adverse possession contradicted his own admission that he held the suit property in trust for the family of Malakwen Arap Rutto, including the Respondent's father's entitlement to 9 acres.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where service of summons is properly effected and the defendant fails to file a defence, the resulting judgment is a regular ex parte judgment and setting it aside is discretionary
  • A defendant registered as trustee of land cannot simultaneously claim the same land by adverse possession

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion seeking setting aside of the ex parte judgment and consequential orders is dismissed with costs to the Respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent discretion to set aside ex parte judgment (Environment and Land Court, ELC No. 273 of 2016)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Betwell Kiplagat Kosgei v Jackson Chepkwony & another [2022] KEELC 1202 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC No. 273 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1202/eng@2022-02-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.