Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (arising from Winam CMCELC NO. 108 OF 2018)· [2022] KEELC 1151 (KLR)

Annah Anyango Odhiambo (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Flora Anudo Ogembo (Deceased) v Zakaria Ogare Odero & another [2022] KEELC 1151 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
24 February 2022
783 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court let a deceased woman's family appeal late, but refused to pause the case because the judgment required no action to be stopped.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by Antony Ombwayo, J, of the High Court at Kisumu on a Notice of Motion dated 25/11/2021 and filed on 9/12/2021 by Annah Anyango Odhiambo, suing as legal representative of the estate of Flora Anudo Ogembo, the plaintiff in Winam CMCELC No. 108 of 2018. The applicant sought leave to appeal out of time against the judgment delivered on 3/8/2021 and a stay of execution of that judgment and decree pending appeal. The application was opposed by the 1st respondent through the affidavit of Georgine J. Imbaya. The court observed that the application was filed more than three months after judgment. It accepted the explanation for the delay: the plaintiff had died on 20/5/2021, before judgment, and the family needed time to obtain a limited grant of letters of administration ad litem (obtained 16/8/2021) and to reorganise and instruct counsel. On that basis the court granted leave to file the appeal out of time in terms of prayer 2 of the motion. However, on the application for stay of execution, the court held that the judgment in the lower court was negative, so there was no order capable of being stayed, and declined that relief. Costs were ordered to be in the cause. The ruling was delivered electronically on 24th February 2022 pursuant to COVID-19 directives issued by the Chief Justice on 15th March 2020.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the delay of over three months in seeking leave to appeal out of time was sufficiently explained

Holding

The delay was sufficiently explained by the death of the plaintiff before judgment, the need to obtain a limited grant of letters of administration ad litem, and the time taken by the family to give instructions to counsel

Reasoning

The court noted the judgment was delivered on 3/8/2021 and the application filed on 9/12/2021, over three months later. It nonetheless accepted that the plaintiff died on 20/5/2021 before judgment, and the family legitimately needed time to obtain a limited grant ad litem (obtained 16/8/2021), reorganise and instruct counsel. The explanation covered the whole period of delay, so leave was granted.

p. 2
02

Whether stay of execution of the lower court judgment could issue pending appeal

Holding

Stay was refused because the judgment in the lower court was negative and there was no order capable of being stayed

Reasoning

The court distinguished between the leave to appeal, which it granted, and the stay of execution, which it refused. Since the judgment in Winam CMCELC No. 108 of 2018 was negative in character, no decree requiring execution existed, and consequently there was nothing to stay pending the appeal.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A stay of execution cannot issue in respect of a negative judgment because there is no positive order to stay
  • Delay in instituting an appeal may reasonably be excused where the deceased plaintiff's family had to obtain letters of administration ad litem and give instructions to counsel

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to the applicant to file the appeal out of time in terms of prayer 2 of the Notice of Motion
  2. 2.Costs in the cause
On appeal from
Winam Chief Magistrate's Court (ELC)
CMCELC No. 108 of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent discretion of the court to extend time for filing an appeal and grant stay of execution pending appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Annah Anyango Odhiambo (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Flora Anudo Ogembo (Deceased) v Zakaria Ogare Odero & another [2022] KEELC 1151 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment (arising from Winam CMCELC NO. 108 OF 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1151/eng@2022-02-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.