Joseph Chuma Nyambegera v County Government of Nyamira & 3 others [2022] KEELC 1142 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether NEMA was improperly joined as a party
The application to strike out NEMA was disallowed; NEMA's statutory functions and its powers over lead agencies such as the County Government make its presence relevant to the dispute
The court examined NEMA's objects and functions under section 9 of EMCA and its power under section 12 to direct lead agencies, including County Governments, to perform environmental duties. It noted road construction projects are among those requiring environmental impact assessment under the Second Schedule and section 58. Since the Petitioner alleges environmental violations connected to the road construction, NEMA remains a proper party. The claim that NEMA cannot perform the remedies sought was rejected.
Legal principles established
#- A party whose presence is necessary for the effective adjudication of environmental claims under EMCA cannot be struck out merely because it says the remedies sought cannot be performed by it
Court orders
#- 1.The Application is disallowed.
- 2.The Respondents to file their responses within 14 days from the date of this Ruling.
- 3.Since the other parties never participated in this Application, no costs shall be awarded.
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles 3, 10, 20, 22, 27(1), 40(3), 47(1) and 162 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010; Section 13 Rules (1) and (2) of the Environment & Land Court Act No. 19 of 2011
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Joseph Chuma Nyambegera v County Government of Nyamira & 3 others [2022] KEELC 1142 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC Petition No. E001 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1142/eng@2022-02-23
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.