Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedEnvironment and Land Court Civil Appeal No. 24 of 2020· [2022] KEELC 1109 (KLR)

Daudi Isingi v Joseph Muthini Wamba [2022] KEELC 1109 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
3 March 2022
2,770 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land appeal court halted eviction and other enforcement orders, confirming you can file a fresh stay application on appeal even after trial court refusals.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (Ochieng J) on the Appellant's Notice of Motion dated 2nd September 2021 seeking stay of execution of two trial court rulings dated 16th June 2020 and 26th August 2021, pending determination of ELC Civil Appeal No. 24 of 2020. The dispute concerns land parcel Mwala/Mango/1233, sold by the Appellant's late father to the Respondent, and an adjoining parcel Mwala/Mango/1232. The trial court had entered ex-parte judgment for the Respondent, dismissed the Appellant's applications to set it aside, stay execution and amend his defence, and granted eviction orders at an application stage though eviction had not been sought in the Plaint. The Respondent opposed, arguing the application was res judicata given two prior dismissed applications, and that a successful litigant must enjoy the fruits of judgment. The court framed a single issue: whether stay should be granted. Applying Order 42 Rule 6(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court found the Appellant had an arguable appeal, that execution would irreparably negate the core of the appeal, that the defence raised triable issues never determined on merit, that the Respondent admitted he had not fully paid the purchase price, and that a mistake of counsel should not be visited on a party. The court held the application was not res judicata because Order 42 Rule 6(1) permits a fresh stay application in the appellate court. The application was allowed; execution of the two rulings was stayed pending appeal, with costs to abide the appeal's outcome. Delivered virtually at Machakos on 3rd March 2022.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Appellant met the threshold for stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6(2)

Holding

The Appellant demonstrated an arguable appeal and that execution would irreparably negate the essential core of the appeal; the Respondent, still on the suit land and holding title, would not be prejudiced by the stay.

Reasoning

The court noted the defence filed in the lower court raised triable issues which were never determined on merit, that the Respondent admitted he had not fully settled the purchase price, and that eviction orders had been granted at an application stage though never sought in the Plaint. Article 50 entitled the Appellant to be heard, and a mistake of counsel should not be visited on a party.

p. 3
02

Whether the application was res judicata given two prior stay applications had been dismissed

Holding

The application was not res judicata because Order 42 Rule 6(1) permits a fresh application for stay in the appellate court where the previous one was determined by the trial court.

Reasoning

The Respondent argued the application was res judicata since two similar applications had been dismissed. The court held that Order 42 Rule 6(1) expressly allows the appellate court to consider a stay application whether the trial court granted or refused it, and the differing orders sought in the prior applications distinguished them.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Stay of execution pending appeal is a discretionary power which must be exercised so that an appeal is not rendered nugatory.
  • Under Order 42 Rule 6(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, a party may file a fresh application for stay of execution in the appellate court even where a similar application was granted or refused by the trial court.
  • A mistake of counsel should not be visited upon a party.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That the execution of the trial Court's Rulings dated 16th June, 2020 and 26th August, 2021 respectively as well as consequential orders thereto be and are hereby stayed pending the hearing and determination of this Appeal
  2. 2.Costs will abide the outcome of this Appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6(2)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6(4)
  • Civil Procedure Actsections 1A, 1B & 3A
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 7
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 50

Cases cited (21)

  • Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission V Maina Kiai & 5 Others
    (2017) eKLR
  • Aga Wanjiru Mwaniki V Jane Wanjiru Mwaniki
    (1997) eKLR
  • Victory Construction V BM (a minor suing through next friend one PMM)
    (2019) eKLR
  • Century Oil Trading Company Vs Kenya Shell Limited
    Milimani HCMA No. 1561 of 2007
  • Gulf Fabricators V County Government of Siaya
    (2020) eKLR
  • Butt Vs Rent Restriction Tribunal
    (1982) KLR 417
  • Duncan Nduracha V Fuad Mohammed & 2 Others
    Nairobi Court of Appeal Civil Application No. 24 of 2011 (2011) eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited V Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    CA No. 77 of 2012
  • Charles Wahome Gethi V Angela Wairimu Gethi
    (2008) eKLR
  • Mohammed Salim t/a Choice Butchery Vs Nasserpuria Memom Jamat
    (2013) eKLR
  • Henderson V Henderson
    (1843 – 60) ALL ER 378
  • Enock Kirao Muhanji V Hamid Abdala Mbarak
    (2013) eKLR
  • Wzo Konjit Tedla & Another V Osborne Ashiono Mutumira
  • Water Painters International V Benjamin Ko’goo t/a Group of Women in Agriculture K’ochieng (Gwako) Ministries
    (2014) eKLR
  • Savings and Loan Limited Vs Susan Wanjiru Muritu
    Nairobi (Milimani) HCCS No. 397 of 2002
  • Eric Oluoch Olele V Kenneth O. Obae
    ELC No. 322 of 2009
  • James Wangalwa & Another Vs Agnes Naliaka Cheseto
    (2012) eKLR
  • Uhuru Highway Development Ltd V Central Bank & Others
    CA No. 36 of 1996
  • Stanley Karanja Wainaina & Another vs. Ridon Anyangu Mutubwa
    [2016] eKLR
  • New Wide Garments EPZ (K) Ltd v Ruth Kanini Kioko
    [2019] eKLR
  • Patrick Kalava Kulamba & Another vs. Philip Kamosu and Roda Ndanu Philip (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Jackline Ndinda Philip (Deceased)
    [2016] eKLR
On appeal from
Principal Magistrate's Court, Machakos
Machakos CMCCC No. 214 of 2016
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 Rule 6(1) & (4) of the Civil Procedure Rules and sections 1A, 1B & 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Daudi Isingi v Joseph Muthini Wamba [2022] KEELC 1109 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Environment and Land Court Civil Appeal No. 24 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1109/eng@2022-03-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.