Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion application dated 8th December 2020 (Milimani Commercial Court CMCC No. E1609 of 2020 referenced as related suit)· [2022] KEELC 1062 (KLR)

Gideon Kyengo & 3 others v Ngei Matibo & 3 others [2022] KEELC 1062 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 February 2022
2,331 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court refused to interfere in a residents' association's internal management, ruling that disputes among association members belong with members or the Registrar of Societies.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling on the Plaintiffs' (Applicants') Notice of Motion dated 8th December 2020 in a dispute between residents of Muimara Estate and the elected officials of the Muimara Estate Residents Association. The Applicants sought interlocutory injunctions restraining the Respondents from implementing a 'court system' and opening Gate B as per a letter dated 5th October 2020, and from stopping tenants or their visitors from entering or leaving the Estate on account of non-payment of service charge, as well as orders compelling audited accounts, appointment of independent auditors, and reference of the dispute to court-annexed mediation. The Respondents, through the Association's chairman Ngei Matibo, opposed the application, arguing that the dispute concerned the management of a registered society, not land, so the court lacked jurisdiction; that a similar suit by the Applicants' tenants had been filed in the lower court; and that a complaint was pending before the Registrar of Societies. The court declined the orders on accounts, auditors and mediation for want of jurisdiction and because they could not issue at an interlocutory stage. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown and Nguruman v Jan Bonde Nielsen, the court held the Applicants had not established a prima facie case: it is not the court's business to interfere with the management of societies, and the Respondents' decisions were not shown to breach the Association's Constitution or the Applicants' property rights. The application was dismissed with costs to the Respondents on 24th February 2022.

Key legal issues

#
01

Prima facie case for interlocutory injunction

Holding

Applicants failed to establish a prima facie case with probability of success

Reasoning

Applying Giella v Cassman Brown and Nguruman v Jan Bonde Nielsen, the court found no clear and unmistakable right threatened. The Respondents' decisions on the gate, court system and service charge were not shown to breach the Association's Constitution or exceed their mandate. Members give officials the mandate to run a society's affairs and may reverse decisions or remove officials.

p. 3
02

Court's role in internal society disputes

Holding

The court will not interfere in the management of a registered society absent breaches of law or its constitution

Reasoning

The dispute concerned the running and management of the Association, registered under the Societies Act. The court held members themselves can reverse decisions of officials or remove them, some disputes may go to the Registrar of Societies, and questions such as the number of gates or level of service charge are not justiciable before the court.

p. 3
03

Timing of orders for accounts, auditors and mediation

Holding

Such orders cannot issue at the interlocutory stage; mediation reference is decided after close of pleadings

Reasoning

The court doubted its jurisdiction to compel audited accounts and appointment of auditors, and held that in any event such substantive relief cannot be granted interlocutorily. Reference to mediation requires appreciation of the issues, possible only after pleadings close.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • It is not the business of the court to interfere with the management of societies; internal disputes should be resolved by members or escalated to the Registrar of Societies, and courts intervene only on breaches of the law or the association's constitution
  • An applicant for a temporary injunction must establish a prima facie case with probability of success, irreparable injury not compensable by damages, and if in doubt, the court decides on a balance of convenience

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 8th December 2020 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Societies ActChapter 108 Laws of Kenya

Cases cited (3)

  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co. Limited & Another
    [1973] E.A 358
  • Mrao Ltd. v First American Bank of Kenya Ltd. & Others
    [2003] eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over disputes arising from use and occupation of land, contested by the Respondents

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gideon Kyengo & 3 others v Ngei Matibo & 3 others [2022] KEELC 1062 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Notice of Motion application dated 8th December 2020 (Milimani Commercial Court CMCC No. E1609 of 2020 referenced as related suit). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/1062/eng@2022-02-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.