Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedBungoma CM ELC Case No 6 of 2015 (Miscellaneous Application - Notice of Motion dated 10th January 2022)· [2022] KEELC 611 (KLR)

Peter Maosa Nyangau v National Bank of Kenya Ltd & another [2022] KEELC 611 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
22 March 2022
2,505 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court in Bungoma refused to halt execution because the applicant couldn't clearly identify the order to be stayed or prove real harm.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, Peter Maosa Nyangau, moved the Environment and Land Court at Bungoma by a Notice of Motion dated 10th January 2022 seeking a stay of execution of the decree and judgment in Bungoma CM ELC Case No 6 of 2015 and all consequential orders, pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal against the Court's own ruling of 20th December 2021, which had dismissed his earlier application for stay of execution and leave to appeal out of time against the Subordinate Court's judgment of 6th October 2020. The 2nd Respondent, Sahra Hersi Moghe, opposed the application through a replying affidavit, arguing that the order sought was academic since no judgment was delivered on 6th October 2021, that the application re-agitated the previously dismissed application and was res judicata, that it did not meet the threshold of Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and that the Applicant was not in occupation of the suit premises. The Applicant did not file submissions as directed; only the 2nd Respondent's counsel filed submissions. The Court held that a party seeking stay must identify with clarity the particular order, decree or judgment to be stayed; that a court cannot stay orders which do not exist; that the ruling of 20th December 2021 was a negative order incapable of execution and not amenable to stay, applying the Kanwal Sarjit Singh Dhiman authority; that substantial loss, the cornerstone of stay applications, was not particularized; and that no appeal was pending since leave to appeal out of time had been declined. The Notice of Motion dated 10th January 2022 was dismissed with costs to the 2nd Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay can issue in respect of a non-existent judgment

Holding

The Court cannot stay a judgment that does not exist; the prayer referring to a judgment dated 6th October 2021 is academic and, if it refers to the judgment of 6th October 2020, it is res judicata having been the subject of the ruling of 20th December 2021

Reasoning

Counsel for the 2nd Respondent demonstrated that no judgment was delivered on 6th October 2021; the only judgment was dated 6th October 2020, and any stay of that judgment was already dealt with in the ruling of 20th December 2021. A court cannot stay orders which do not exist and courts do not act in vain.

p. 3
02

Whether a negative order can be stayed pending appeal

Holding

A ruling that merely dismisses an application without directing any party to do anything is a negative order incapable of execution and not amenable to stay

Reasoning

The ruling of 20th December 2021 dismissed the Applicant's application for stay; it was a negative order. Following the Court of Appeal in Kanwal Sarjit Singh Dhiman v Keshauji Jivraj Shah, such an order is incapable of execution save in respect of costs and cannot be the subject of a stay application.

p. 3
03

Whether the Applicant demonstrated substantial loss

Holding

The Applicant failed to particularize substantial loss; the claim of eviction was not rebutted by evidence of occupation, and no impecuniosity of the decree-holder was suggested to justify stay of the monetary decree

Reasoning

The Applicant merely stated the appeal would be rendered nugatory if evicted. The 2nd Respondent's averment that the Applicant is not in occupation was not rebutted by supplementary affidavit. A court cannot stay execution of what has already happened, and the Applicant did not suggest the 2nd Respondent could not refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeded.

p. 4
04

Whether any appeal is pending

Holding

No appeal is pending before the Court; leave to appeal out of time to this Court having been declined on 20th December 2021, there is no appeal pending

Reasoning

The judgment of the Subordinate Court of 6th October 2020 can only be appealed first to this Court, not directly to the Court of Appeal. Leave having been declined, the intended appeal is not pending, undermining the basis for a stay pending its hearing and determination.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A party seeking stay of a Decree or Judgment must identify with clarity the particular order, decree or judgment sought to be stayed
  • A negative order (one dismissing an application and not directing any party to do anything) is incapable of execution and not amenable to stay of execution pending appeal
  • Substantial loss is the cornerstone for granting stay of execution pending appeal and must be particularized, not vaguely asserted

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 10th January 2022 is dismissed with costs to the 2nd Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6(1) and (2)

Cases cited (3)

  • KANWAL SARJIT SINGH DHIMAN v KESHAUJI JIVRAJ SHAH
    2008 eKLR
  • KENYA SHELL LTD v BENJAMIN KIBURU & ANOTHER
    1986 KLR 410
  • MACHIRA t/a MACHIRA & COMPANY ADVOCATES v EAST AFRICAN STANDARD (No 2)
    2002 2 KLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules (stay of execution pending appeal to the Court of Appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Peter Maosa Nyangau v National Bank of Kenya Ltd & another [2022] KEELC 611 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Bungoma CM ELC Case No 6 of 2015 (Miscellaneous Application - Notice of Motion dated 10th January 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/611/eng@2022-03-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.