Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedKeroka ELC Appeal (from Keroka PMELC No. 21 of 2020)· [2022] KEELC 547 (KLR)

Vincent Orindo Nyambane & another v Daniel Nyangaresi Orindo & another [2022] KEELC 547 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 March 2022
1,609 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court confirmed that any dissatisfied party has an absolute constitutional right to appeal, and dismissed an attempt to strike out a land appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by Mugo Kamau J of the Environment and Land Court at Nyamira on a preliminary objection in an appeal from Keroka PMELC No. 21 of 2020. The lower court had dismissed the Plaintiff's claim seeking to stop the burial of Jason Orindo Arasa on L.R. NO. EAST KITUTU/KEBIRICHI/3155, finding the titles to parcels 3155, 3156 and 3157 were fraudulently obtained, ordering their cancellation, reversion of the green cards to the original parcel EAST KITUTU/KEBIRICHI/794, burial on the original parcel, and costs against the Plaintiff. The Plaintiffs appealed. The Respondents raised a preliminary objection dated 14/01/2022 arguing the Appellants lacked locus standi, the suit being a fruit of fraud and the succession cause underlying the transfer having concerned the estate of Ernest Nyambane Abunga rather than Nyambane Orindo, and that cancellation of the title had rendered the appeal academic. The court held that the right of appeal is an absolute constitutional right under Articles 48 and 50(1), exercisable by any aggrieved litigant, and that the ELC has appellate jurisdiction under Section 13(4) of the ELC Act. Applying the Mukisa Biscuits standard, the court found the objection was not a true preliminary objection, dismissed it as an abuse of process, awarded the Appellants its costs, and ordered the Kisii High Court succession file returned forthwith. The main appeal remains pending.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Appellants had locus standi to appeal

Holding

The objection to locus standi failed; the Appellants were parties in the lower court with an express right of appeal

Reasoning

The court held that an aggrieved party in the lower court has an express right of appeal, which is a constitutional right under Articles 48 and 50(1), and the ELC has appellate jurisdiction under Section 13(4) of the ELC Act. The claim that the suit was a fruit of fraud required evidence and did not qualify as a true preliminary objection.

p. 2
02

Whether the appeal had become academic because the title had been cancelled

Holding

The court did not uphold this argument; the objection was dismissed as an abuse of process

Reasoning

The Respondents argued that cancellation of L.R. NO. EAST KITUTU/KEBIRICHI/3155 left the appeal academic; the Appellants countered that cancellation, if done, breached a stay. The court treated the objection as improperly raised before directions and an abuse of process, without determining merits.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The right of appeal is a constitutional right accorded to any dissatisfied party and cannot be denied or curtailed
  • A ground going to locus standi argued on contested facts does not qualify as a preliminary objection in the Mukisa Biscuits sense

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Preliminary Objection dated 14/01/2022 is dismissed
  2. 2.The Respondents to bear the costs of the Preliminary Objection
  3. 3.The file containing Kisii High Court Succession Cause No. 475 of 2014 shall be returned to the Kisii High Court Registry forthwith

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 48
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 50(1)
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 65
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 43
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rules 31 and 32
  • Environment and Land Court Act, 2012Section 13(4) and 13(7)(a)

Cases cited (1)

  • Mukisa Biscuits
On appeal from
Principal Magistrate's Court, Keroka
Keroka PMELC No. 21 of 2020
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 13(4) of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2012 (appellate jurisdiction over subordinate courts in land matters)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Vincent Orindo Nyambane & another v Daniel Nyangaresi Orindo & another [2022] KEELC 547 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Keroka ELC Appeal (from Keroka PMELC No. 21 of 2020). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/547/eng@2022-03-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.