Maureen Agolla Ong’any v Tom Odago Opiyo [2022] KEELC 505 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court struck out a bid to regain an apartment, ruling that restitution after a reversed appeal decree must be sought in the original trial court, not the appellate court.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Jurisdiction to entertain an application for restitution under Section 91 of the Civil Procedure Act
The ELC on appeal is not the proper forum; only the court of first instance (the Chief Magistrate's Court whose decree was reversed) has jurisdiction.
The court noted that jurisdiction flows from the Constitution or legislation and cannot be assumed by innovation. Section 91 of the Civil Procedure Act expressly vests the power to order restitution upon the court of first instance, being the court whose decree has been varied or reversed. Since the decree under which the Applicant was evicted was that of the Chief Magistrate's Court in Milimani ELC 17 of 2020, restitution must be sought there. The Court of Appeal decision in Cyrus Komo was adopted in support.
Whether compensation of Kshs. 300,000 for mesne profits and damages can be granted on an interlocutory application
No; the claim is premature, misconceived and out of place, having neither been specifically pleaded nor proved, and being unsuitable for determination on an interlocutory application.
The court observed that it was dealing with an interlocutory application, not a substantive matter. A claim for mesne profits, being akin to special damages, must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved; here the Applicant merely threw the figure on the face of the application without explanation or supporting evidence. Moreover, mesne profits are payable only in respect of proven ownership of the property, which must await a plenary hearing at the appropriate forum.
Legal principles established
#- Where a decree is varied or reversed, an application for restitution under Section 91 of the Civil Procedure Act must be made to the court of first instance, not to the appellate court.
- A court cannot arrogate to itself jurisdiction exceeding that conferred by the Constitution or written law.
- A claim for mesne profits, akin to special damages, must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved, and cannot be granted on an interlocutory application.
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion Application dated 17th November 2021 is declared incompetent and struck out.
- 2.Costs of the Application shall abide the Appeal.
- On appeal from
- Chief Magistrate's Court, Milimani
- Milimani CM ELC 17 of 2020 (Milimani MC & ELC 17 of 2020)
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 91 of the Civil Procedure Act, Chapter 21 Laws of Kenya (jurisdiction of the court of first instance on reversal or variation of a decree)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Maureen Agolla Ong’any v Tom Odago Opiyo [2022] KEELC 505 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). ELC A054 of 2020 (Notice of Motion dated 17th November 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/505/eng@2022-02-24
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.