Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially Allowed· [2022] KEELC 422 (KLR)

Mavoko Water & Sewerage Company Limited v Safaricom Staff Pension Scheme Registered Trustees & another [2022] KEELC 422 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 April 2022
2,766 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Two applications arose in a suit by a water and sewerage company (Plaintiff) against the developer/trustee of the Crystal River Project (1st Defendant). By a Notice of Motion dated 14th July 2021 under Order 40 Rules 1 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the Plaintiff sought interlocutory injunctions restraining the Defendants from excavating, constructing or building atop its sewer line along Quarry Road and old Mombasa Road, contending the Defendant's access road construction endangered a sewer line serving over 139,000 residents. The 1st Defendant opposed, asserting the sewer line lay 4.5 metres below ground, over a metre from its box culvert, and that it held KENHA and Machakos County Government approvals; it also applied by Notice of Motion dated 19th October 2021 for a site visit and discharge of the ex parte orders issued on 14th July 2021. The court framed two issues: entitlement to an interlocutory injunction, and whether the ex parte orders should be set aside. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown, the Mrao definition of a prima facie case, and the Court of Appeal's elaboration in Nguruman, the court found the Plaintiff's asserted injuries speculative: it did not dispute the sewer line already ran under Quarry 39 Road carrying traffic, did not controvert the engineering findings on depth, and tendered no evidence challenging the regulatory approvals or showing actual interference with its wayleave. Failing the first limb, the remaining Giella limbs were not considered. The court dismissed the Plaintiff's application, set aside the ex parte orders of 14th July 2021, allowed the 1st Defendant's application, directed the parties to organize a site visit with the Deputy Registrar, and made costs of both applications costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff established a prima facie case for interlocutory injunction

Holding

No prima facie case established; the alleged injuries were speculative given the depth of the sewer line and the KENHA and County approvals obtained by the 1st Defendant.

Reasoning

Applying Giella v Cassman Brown and the Mrao definition of a prima facie case, the court noted the Plaintiff did not deny its sewer line runs under Quarry 39 Road with traffic, did not dispute the 4.5 metre depth of the line, and produced no evidence challenging the KENHA and Machakos County Government approvals or showing how the box culvert interferes with the sewer line. Its claims of harm rested on engineering opinion and speculation rather than proof of a threatened violation of a clear right.

p. 3
02

Whether the ex parte orders issued on 14th July, 2021 should be set aside

Holding

Set aside, because having failed the first Giella limb the Plaintiff could not sustain the interim orders.

Reasoning

Associating itself with Nguruman, the court held that where the first limb of the injunction test fails, the remaining limbs need not be considered. Since the Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a prima facie case, the ex parte injunctions in place since 14th July 2021 could not stand and were set aside.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a party fails to prove the first limb of the Giella test for injunction, the court need not and will not consider the remaining limbs.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The ex parte orders of injunction issued on 14th July, 2021 are set aside.
  2. 2.The Notice of Motion dated 14th July, 2021 is disallowed as unmerited.
  3. 3.The Notice of Motion dated 19th October, 2021 is allowed as merited.
  4. 4.The parties to organize a site visit with the Deputy Registrar of the court.
  5. 5.Costs of the two applications to be in the cause.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 Rules 1 & 4
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 Rule 7
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 51 Rules 1 & 15
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 63(e)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSections 18 and 19

Cases cited (15)

  • Giella v Cassman Brown
    (1973) EA 358
  • Brookside Studios Ltd & Anor v A.A Kawir Transporters Ltd & 4 Others
    CA 346 of 2013
  • Nguruman Ltd v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    CA No. 77 of 2012
  • Adrian Kamotho Njenga v Council of Governors & 3 others
    (2020) eKLR
  • Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v James Kinuthia & 2 Others
    (2019)
  • Luo Council of Elders v County Government of Bomet & 24 Others
    (2018) eKLR
  • Peter K. Waweru v Republic
    (2006) eKLR
  • Rwanyange Resident Self Help Group v Tana Water Service Board & 2 Others
    (2019) eKLR
  • Save Lamu & 5 Others v National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) & Another
    Appeal No. 3 of 2018 (2019) eKLR
  • Mrao Limited v First American Bank of Kenya Limited & 2 Others
    (2003) KLR
  • Uhuru Highway Development Limited v Central Bank of Kenya & 2 others
  • St Patricks Hill School Ltd v Bank of Africa Kenya Ltd
    (2018) eKLR
  • Tate Access Floors Inc v Boswell
    (1990) 3 All ER 303
  • Brink's Mat Limited v Elcombe
    (1988) 3 All ER 188
  • Ochola Kamili Holdings Ltd v Guardian Bank Limited
    [2018] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 40 Rules 1 & 4 and Order 51 Rules 1 & 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010; Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act; Sections 18 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mavoko Water & Sewerage Company Limited v Safaricom Staff Pension Scheme Registered Trustees & another [2022] KEELC 422 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/422/eng@2022-04-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.