Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in excerpt· [2022] KEELC 73 (KLR)

Okello & 11 others v Letting & another (Environment & Land Case 136 of 2015) [2022] KEELC 73 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
4 May 2022
1,710 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Environment and Land Court at Eldoret (S.M. Kibunja, J) delivered a ruling on two notices of motion by the 1st defendant, David Kimeli Leting. The first, dated 7th May 2021, sought striking out of the 10th and 12th plaintiffs' claims on the ground that both died before the suit was filed on 14th May 2015. The court found from the death certificates that the 12th plaintiff died on 20th January 2013 and the 10th plaintiff's death was unrebutted. Relying on the Law of Succession Act and the Court of Appeal decision in Barnes Muema v Francis Masuni Kyangangu [2019] eKLR, the court held that only duly appointed legal representatives could pursue claims on behalf of the deceased estates, and that lack of standing goes to jurisdiction, so Article 159 and section 1B expeditious-disposal considerations could not save the claim. The names of the 10th and 12th plaintiffs were struck out under Order 1 Rule 10(2), with costs of that application awarded against the plaintiffs' counsel personally since deceased persons could not have instructed counsel. The second application, dated 7th June 2021, sought striking out of the 1st plaintiff's suit on grounds that he dealt with non-owners of the suit land. The court held the plaint disclosed a reasonable cause of action requiring trial, and a cause of action is not extinguished merely because the defendant believes the wrong person was dealt with. That application was dismissed with costs to the 1st plaintiff. The suit proceeds to hearing on merit as against the remaining parties.

Key legal issues

#
01

Capacity of deceased persons' purported plaintiffs and abatement

Holding

The 10th and 12th plaintiffs died before the suit was filed; no party had legal capacity to sue on their behalf and their names were struck out under Order 1 Rule 10(2)

Reasoning

Death certificates confirmed the 12th plaintiff died on 20th January 2013 and the death of the 10th plaintiff was unrebutted; the suit was filed on 14th May 2015. Claims on behalf of deceased persons' estates require a grant under the Law of Succession Act. Lack of standing goes to jurisdiction, overriding Article 159 expeditious-disposal considerations.

02

Whether the 1st Plaintiff's suit should be struck out

Holding

The application was dismissed because the plaint disclosed a reasonable cause of action

Reasoning

Striking out is a final determination on pleadings; the alleged dealings with non-owners raised triable issues on the sale agreements of 2005. The court held it should not make final determinations before the main hearing.

p. 4
03

Costs of the 7th May 2021 application

Holding

Costs payable personally by plaintiffs' counsel because deceased plaintiffs could not have instructed counsel

Reasoning

Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act provides costs follow the event; since the deceased could not have instructed counsel, counsel must bear the costs.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A party suing on behalf of a deceased person's estate must be a duly appointed legal representative holding a grant of letters of administration; deceased persons cannot be named as plaintiffs
  • A cause of action is not extinguished merely because the defendant believes the plaintiff dealt with the wrong person; such disputes should be determined at trial

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 1st defendant's application dated 7th May 2021 granted in terms of prayer (1); the names of the 10th and 12th plaintiffs struck from the proceedings
  2. 2.Costs of the application dated 7th May 2021 to be paid by counsel for the plaintiffs
  3. 3.The 1st defendant's notice of motion dated 7th June 2021 dismissed with costs to the 1st plaintiff

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 1B; section 27 (Cap 21)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 10(2)
  • Law of Succession ActCap 160

Cases cited (1)

  • Barnes Muema v Francis Masuni Kyangangu
    [2019] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction; Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) and Civil Procedure Rules, Order 1 Rule 10(2)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Okello & 11 others v Letting & another (Environment & Land Case 136 of 2015) [2022] KEELC 73 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/73/eng@2022-05-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.