Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedJudicial Review No 4 of 2016 (consolidated with Judicial Review No 9 of 2017)· [2022] KEELC 3 (KLR)

Republic v National Land Commission & 7 others; Taylor & 5 others (Ex parte) (Suing as the Trustees of Uasin Gishu Arts Society of Eldoret) (Judicial Review 09 of 2017 & 04 of 2016 (Consolidated)) [2022] KEELC 3 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 February 2022
5,734 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~23 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court quashed a county's allocation of leased land and ordered a fresh, lawful renewal process for the original leaseholder.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Two consolidated judicial review applications by ex-parte applicants who held Eldoret Municipality Block 13/22 (formerly LR No 6619/35) under a 1959 grant for a term expiring around 2008, sought certiorari to quash the decision of April 27, 2016 and the subsequent gazette notice allocating the property to the County Government of Uasin Gishu, prohibitions against title issuance, and mandamus compelling a fresh, lawful renewal process. The applicants asserted a pre-eminent right of renewal, having applied for renewal before expiry and pursued it through successive correspondence. The County Government and the National Land Commission countered that the lease had expired, the land reverted to public land under article 62, the applicants had not used the property as a public cultural centre (alleging a private restaurant/bar), and that no right of renewal existed for town plots. The court, applying Kenya Industrial Estates v Anne Chepsiror, held that a legitimate expectation of renewal attaches where a lessee of developed property has complied with the grant's terms, and found the applicants' explanation of the 'bar' as a refreshment area satisfactory. It further held the renewal application was processed in breach of article 47 and the Fair Administrative Action Act - slow, inefficient, and involving a partial interested party. Certiorari was granted quashing Table 7, Entry 18 of Gazette Notice No 6862 of July 17, 2017, and the National Land Commission and County Government were ordered to process the renewal afresh in accordance with the law, with costs to the ex-parte applicants paid by those two respondents. Prohibition and possession-related mandamus prayers were not included in the final orders.

Key legal issues

#
01

Existence of a pre-eminent right of renewal of an expired lease over a developed town plot

Holding

A legitimate expectation of renewal exists where the lessee has complied with the terms of the grant, especially where the property has been developed; the applicants were using the property as a cultural centre in accordance with the grant

Reasoning

The court adopted Munyao Sila J's harmonization in Kenya Industrial Estates Ltd v Anne Chepsiror: for developed leasehold property, refusing renewal would unjustly enrich the lessor and deprive the lessee of investments reverting as fixtures. The alleged non-compliance (use as private restaurant/bar) was rebutted; the 'bar' was a refreshment area serving no alcohol, and the aged theatre building dated to the 1960s.

p. 12
02

Whether the renewal application was processed in accordance with the law

Holding

The administrative process was unfair and non-compliant with article 47 of the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Action Act

Reasoning

The application made on February 5, 2008, with follow-ups in 2008 and 2009, elicited no timely response; the National Land Commission was still consulting the County Government - an interested party incapable of impartiality - as late as April 2014, and the property was then allocated to the County Government in 2017. The action was neither expeditious, efficient, lawful, reasonable nor procedurally fair.

p. 13
03

Appropriate relief in judicial review

Holding

Certiorari granted to quash the gazette notice allocation; the respondents directed to process the renewal afresh in accordance with the law

Reasoning

Though judicial review does not substitute the court's decision for the impugned one, the respondents were bound by the Constitution and statute to process the renewal application lawfully, taking into account the legitimate expectation of the previous leaseholder, leaving them 'little wiggle room' but not dictating the outcome.

p. 14

Legal principles established

#
  • A former holder of a Government leasehold title who has complied with the terms of the lease holds a legitimate expectation that the lease of a developed property will be renewed to him
  • Processing of a lease renewal application must comply with article 47 of the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Action Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Prayer 1 of the notice of motion dated November 1, 2017 granted: Table 7, Entry No 18 of Gazette Notice No 6862 of July 17, 2017 called into court and quashed
  2. 2.The National Land Commission and the County Government of Uasin Gishu to process afresh the ex parte applicants' application for renewal of lease for Eldoret Municipality Block 13/22 [formerly LR No 6619/35] in accordance with the law
  3. 3.Ex parte applicants' costs paid by the National Land Commission and the County Government of Uasin Gishu

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 53 rule 3
  • Law Reform Actsections 8 and 9
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 47; article 62
  • Physical Planning Actsections 31 and 33(1)
  • Government Land Act (Repealed)section 27; section 109 of the Land Registration Act repealed it
  • Registered Land Act (Repealed)section 60
  • Land Registration Actsection 109
  • Land Actsection 13
  • Fair Administrative Action Actsection 4

Cases cited (8)

  • Kenya Industrial Estates Limited v Anne Chepsiror & 5 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Goan Institute Nakuru v Said Abdalla Azubedi
    (2007) eKLR
  • Nairobi City Council v Chhagal Lala Divani W/o Chhagan Lala & 2 Others
    (2013) eKLR
  • Suleiman Murunga v Nilestar Holdings Ltd & another
    Nairobi ELC No 1549 of 2013, (2014) eKLR
  • Republic v Commissioner of Lands & 3 others ex parte Shelfco Ltd
    Milimani Judicial Review Misc Application No 173 of 2012
  • Abdul Waheed Sheikh and Abdul Hameed Sheikh as Charitable Trustees of the Sheikh Fazal Ilachi Noordin Trust v Commissioner of Lands & 3 Others
    Nairobi High Court, Misc Civil Case No 1531 of 2005 (OS) (2012) eKLR
  • Serah Mweru Muhu v Commissioner of Lands & 2 Others
    Petition No 413 of 2012 [2014] eKLR
  • Charles Mwangi Kagonia v Dharj D Popat & another
    Nairobi High Court, Civil Suit No 96 of 2005, [2006] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 53 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 and sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act (Cap 26)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v National Land Commission & 7 others; Taylor & 5 others (Ex parte) (Suing as the Trustees of Uasin Gishu Arts Society of Eldoret) (Judicial Review 09 of 2017 & 04 of 2016 (Consolidated)) [2022] KEELC 3 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Judicial Review No 4 of 2016 (consolidated with Judicial Review No 9 of 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/3/eng@2022-02-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.