Republic v Principal Magistrate's Court at Eldoret; Philemon Kemboi Kitum & 2 others (Interested Parties) Ex parte Kenya Forest Service [2021] KEELC 4758 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's High Court cancelled magistrate orders allowing charcoal transport because traders skipped the dispute-resolution process the Forest Act requires them to follow first.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Jurisdiction of the Magistrate's Court to grant charcoal movement permits
Although magistrates' courts have jurisdiction over Article 162(2) environmental and land disputes, the respondent magistrate lacked jurisdiction in the first instance because the statutory dispute resolution framework under section 70 of the Forest Conservation and Management Act was not used.
The court accepted that magistrates' courts may hear Article 162(2) disputes under section 9 of the Magistrates' Court Act. However, section 70 of the Forest Conservation and Management Act requires forest disputes to go first to the lowest devolved structure, then the National Environment Tribunal, with appeal to the Environment and Land Court. The interested parties bypassed this framework, so the subordinate court had no jurisdiction in the first instance.
Exhaustion of alternative remedies
The interested parties should have pursued the administrative and statutory dispute mechanisms in section 70 of the Forest Conservation and Management Act and section 9 of the Fair Administrative Actions Act before moving the court.
Section 70 provides an elaborate procedure: lowest devolved structure, then the National Environment Tribunal, then appeal to the Environment and Land Court. There was no evidence the interested parties attempted these procedures. The Court of Appeal's exhaustion doctrine in Muthinja Kabiru requires courts to be fora of last resort, and courts have struck out suits where prescribed procedures were ignored.
Availability of the declaratory relief in judicial review
The declaration sought could not be granted in judicial review proceedings.
Citing Sangani Investment Limited, section 8 of the Law Reform Act limits judicial review orders to mandamus, certiorari and prohibition. A declaration requires viva voce evidence and determination on the merits, whereas judicial review concerns only the decision-making process, not the merits.
Legal principles established
#- A declaration cannot be granted in judicial review proceedings because judicial review is concerned with the decision-making process, not the merits.
- Where a statute prescribes a dispute resolution mechanism, it must be exhausted before the High Court's jurisdiction is invoked.
- A subordinate court cannot assume jurisdiction in the absence of a dispute and where the statutory framework for forest disputes has been bypassed.
Court orders
#- 1.An order of Certiorari quashing the Ruling and order of the Principal Magistrate, Hon. Naomi Wairimu, in Eldoret CM's Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 30 of 2019, Philemon Kemboi Kitum v Chief Conservator of Forests made on 6th May 2019
- 2.An order of Certiorari quashing the Ruling and order of the Principal Magistrate, Hon. Naomi Wairimu, in Eldoret CM's Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 46 of 2019, Benjamin Cheboi v Chief Conservator of Forests made on 20th June 2019
- 3.An order of Certiorari quashing the Ruling and order of the Principal Magistrate, Hon. Naomi Wairimu, in Eldoret CM's Miscellaneous Civil Suit No. 80 of 2019, Elijah K. Kibet v Chief Conservator of Forests made on 14th August 2019
- 4.Each party to bear their own costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Judicial review jurisdiction of the High Court under the Law Reform Act (order of certiorari), sections 8 and 9
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Republic v Principal Magistrate's Court at Eldoret; Philemon Kemboi Kitum & 2 others (Interested Parties) Ex parte Kenya Forest Service [2021] KEELC 4758 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Judicial Review Motion dated 16th September 2019 (Eldoret). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/4758/eng@2021-03-02
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.