Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in judgment (Plaint dated 8th November 2021)· [2021] KEELC 4741 (KLR)

Okwemba (Suing as Administrator of the Estate of Peter Omutola Okwemba - Deceased) v Osiako (Environment & Land Case 18 of 2021) [2021] KEELC 4741 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 December 2021
3,174 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Vihiga court ruled that long family occupation can create a customary trust over registered land, forcing the registered owner to transfer a share to the widow living there.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, a widow suing as personal representative of the estate of her late husband Peter Omutola Okwemba, sued her brother-in-law, the registered proprietor of East Bunyore/Ebunangwe/1644, seeking a declaration that he holds 0.31 ha of the parcel in trust for the estate and an order compelling subdivision and transfer. She relied on section 28 of the Land Registration Act, which secures customary trusts as overriding interests, and on the Supreme Court decision in Isack M'inanga Kieba vs Isaya Theuri M'lintari. Her evidence was that the parties' father-in-law had directed that the suit land be shared between her husband and Tom Omutola, and she had occupied and developed the land for 37 years, buried her husband and parents-in-law there, with minutes of a 2016 elders' meeting corroborating the distribution. The Defendant denied the trust, claiming absolute ownership and asserting that the Plaintiff's husband had instead received parcel 1615, for which no documentary evidence was produced; his own witness confirmed he attended the elders' meeting but refused to sign the minutes. Applying the elements of customary trust set out by the Supreme Court, the court found the claim proved on a balance of probabilities. It declared that a customary trust exists over 0.31 ha in favour of the Plaintiff, ordered the Defendant to subdivide and transfer that portion forthwith, failing which the Deputy Registrar to execute the documents, and directed each party to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Defendant holds a portion of the suit land in customary trust for the Plaintiff

Holding

Yes. The Defendant holds 0.31 ha of East Bunyore/Ebunangwe/1644 in customary trust for the Plaintiff as personal representative of her late husband's estate.

Reasoning

Although the land was registered in the Defendant's name in 1965, he never resided on it, while the Plaintiff and her late husband lived, developed and buried their dead on it for over 37 years. Evidence including minutes of an elders' meeting showed the deceased father had directed the suit land be shared between the Plaintiff's husband and Tom Omutola. Applying section 28 of the Land Registration Act and the Supreme Court's elements of customary trust, the court found all elements proved on a balance of probabilities.

p. 6
02

Whether the Plaintiff proved her case on a balance of probabilities

Holding

Yes, having proved the customary trust.

Reasoning

The court found the trust claim proved on a balance of probabilities through the Plaintiff's long occupation, development of the land, burial of her husband and parents thereon, and the elders' meeting minutes, against the Defendant's unsubstantiated claims about a non-existent parcel 1615 and inconsistent testimony on who sold it.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Customary trust is an overriding interest to which registered land is subject even without notation on the register.
  • A customary trust must be proved by evidence showing the nature of the holding of the land and the intention of the parties.
  • A customary trust, once proved, binds a registered proprietor even upon a first registration.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.It is hereby declared a customary law trust exists over the suit land namely that the Defendant holds a portion measuring 0.31 ha of land parcel known as east bunyore/ebunangwe/1644 occupied by the Plaintiff on the ground in favour of the Plaintiff
  2. 2.The Defendant do subdivide land parcel known as east bunyore/ebunangwe/1644 and transfer a portion thereof measuring 0.31 hactares to the Plaintiff forthwith in default the Deputy Registrar of the Court to execute the requisite documents to effect subdivision and transfer.
  3. 3.Each party to bear own costs.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration ActSection 28(b)
  • Registered Land Act (repealed)Section 28 (proviso)

Cases cited (4)

  • Isaack Kieba M'inanga vs Isaaya Theuri M'Linturi & Another
    SCOK No.10 of 2015; [2018] eKLR
  • Justus Maina Muruku vs Jane Waithira Mwangi
    [2018] eKLR
  • Mbui Mukangu vs Gerald Mutwiri Mbui
    C.A No. 281 of 2000
  • Kiarie vs Kinuthia
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil suit on land title and customary trust under the Land Registration Act (Court's jurisdiction not expressly stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Okwemba (Suing as Administrator of the Estate of Peter Omutola Okwemba - Deceased) v Osiako (Environment & Land Case 18 of 2021) [2021] KEELC 4741 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment (Plaint dated 8th November 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/4741/eng@2021-12-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.