Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedJudicial Review Chamber Summons dated 19th June 2019 (Amended 30th January 2020)· [2021] KEELC 3988 (KLR)

Republic v National Land Commisison & 2 others Ex parte Gatitu Building Company Limited [2021] KEELC 3988 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
18 March 2021
719 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court ordered land officials to issue a title deed to a Nairobi property owner who had occupied the land for over 30 years without one.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The ex-parte applicant, through its director Stephen Minae Gate, moved the court by Chamber Summons dated 19th June 2019 and amended on 30th January 2020 under Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 159(2) of the Constitution, seeking leave to institute judicial review proceedings for an order of mandamus compelling the respondents to issue it with a land title over LR No 209/8363/41 in Nairobi County. The applicant contended it purchased the property in 1997, held a deed plan issued in 1983, and had been in possession for over thirty years, building residential units and running a hotel. The mother title, LR No 209/8363, was a 36-year-and-6-month lease issued in 1974 which lapsed without extension because the original proprietors - John Kagai Gachenga, William Kyengo Mwangangi and Sophia Nyokabi Mathu - are all deceased. The applicant claimed denial of fair administrative action and of the right to property. Though duly served, the 1st respondent withdrew from participation and the 2nd and 3rd respondents filed no responses, leaving the application unopposed. The court, citing Section 23(2) of the Land Act as amended, found merit in the application and issued an order of mandamus compelling the 2nd and 3rd respondents to issue the applicant with the title, with costs of the application borne by the applicant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether mandamus lies to compel issuance of a land title where the mother title's lease term has lapsed

Holding

The court found merit in the unopposed application and issued mandamus compelling the 2nd and 3rd respondents to issue the title

Reasoning

The applicant was the proprietor of LR No 209/8363/41 by virtue of an agreement for sale dated 8th October 1997 and a deed plan issued by the lands office on 30th June 1983. It had been in possession for over thirty years and had put up multiple residential dwelling units and runs a hotel on the property. The mother title LR No 209/8363 was a 36-year-and-6-months lease issued in 1974 which lapsed, and the original proprietors are all deceased so no one could apply for extension. The applicant had been denied fair administrative action and the right to property. The respondents, though served, did not oppose. The court found merit and granted mandamus.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An unopposed judicial review application, if it discloses merit, justifies the grant of the orders sought

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of mandamus issued compelling the 2nd and 3rd respondents to issue the applicant with a title in respect to the property known as LR NO 209/8363/41 situated within Nairobi County
  2. 2.Costs of the application to be borne by the applicant
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 53 rules 1(1), 1(2) and 1(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010; Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 159(2) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v National Land Commisison & 2 others Ex parte Gatitu Building Company Limited [2021] KEELC 3988 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Judicial Review Chamber Summons dated 19th June 2019 (Amended 30th January 2020). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/3988/eng@2021-03-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.