Gregory Muthiani v Standard Bank Limited [2021] KEELC 3896 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether limitation can be raised by preliminary objection
Yes; a plea of limitation is a pure point of law under the Mukisa Biscuit test
The court applied the Mukisa Biscuit definition, which expressly lists a plea of limitation as an example of a proper preliminary objection. The court rejected the Petitioner's submission that limitation requires judicial discretion, holding that whether the suit is time barred can be determined by examining the pleadings alone.
Whether the petition is time barred
Yes; the cause of action accrued in 1983 at the latest and the petition filed in 2019 is far outside the limitation periods
On his own pleadings the Petitioner was sued in 1981, instructed counsel, and learnt of the auction in 1983. Section 4 of the Limitation of Actions Act prescribes six years for contract and Section 7 twelve years for recovery of land. Even the fraud proviso in Section 26 does not assist given knowledge since 1983.
Legal principles established
#- A plea of limitation can properly be raised by way of preliminary objection as a pure point of law
Court orders
#- 1.The petition is dismissed with costs to the Respondent
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles 22, 23, 165 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (as invoked by the Petitioner)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Gregory Muthiani v Standard Bank Limited [2021] KEELC 3896 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/3896/eng@2021-03-16
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.