Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissed· [2021] KEELC 3888 (KLR)

Mzee Adama Makinja & 2 others v Livingstone Ndungu Waithaka & 5 others [2021] KEELC 3888 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
18 March 2021
1,991 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court in Mombasa refused to add a company to a land case and dismissed fraud claims, because no paperwork backed them up.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling on a notice of motion dated 5th June 2020 by which the plaintiffs sought leave to join Junac Solutions Ltd as 4th plaintiff, to amend their pleadings to include allegations of a violent and illegal eviction carried out in March 2020 allegedly with police assistance, and to set aside orders issued on 6th March 2020 in favour of the defendants on grounds of fraud, non-disclosure of material facts and misrepresentation. The 2nd defendant opposed, asserting registered ownership of the subdivided parcels comprising the suit property, denying any eviction of the plaintiffs, and contending the application was an omnibus aimed at delaying the suit. The court, applying Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules, held that although the application was said to be in favour of Junac Solutions Ltd, the annexed sale agreement was in the personal name of Benson A. Onjole, and no document in the company's name nor authority from it was exhibited. Any cause of action on that agreement lay only between its parties, none of whom was a defendant, and joinder would embarrass and delay the suit. On the setting-aside prayer, the court found the applicants' admission that the property is registered in the 2nd defendant's name rendered allegations of fraud and non-disclosure superfluous, that fraud was not sufficiently proved, and that no new and important matter or evidence justified review. The notice of motion was dismissed with costs to the 2nd defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the proposed 4th plaintiff is a necessary party under Order 1 Rule 10(2)

Holding

Junac Solutions Ltd is not a necessary party; no exhibited document bears its name and its alleged cause of action arises from an agreement between Benson A. Onjole and James Kiage Orwaru to which the defendants are strangers

Reasoning

The deponent described the company as purchaser and business operator, but the annexed sale agreement was in his personal name. No document in the company's name and no board authority were produced. Any claim on the agreement lies only between its parties, none of whom is a defendant. Joinder of a party who has not itself sought to be joined would embarrass and delay the suit, so the court declined to exercise its discretion to add it.

p. 3
02

Whether the orders of 6th March 2020 should be set aside for fraud and non-disclosure

Holding

The setting-aside application fails: the applicants admit registration of the suit property in the 2nd defendant's name, fraud was not sufficiently proved, and no new and important matter or evidence was produced

Reasoning

The applicants conceded the suit land is registered in the name of the 2nd defendant, making allegations of fraud and material non-disclosure superfluous. Allegations of fraud must be sufficiently proved; none was. No new or important matter or evidence was produced to justify review or setting aside of the orders issued on 6th March 2020 in favour of the defendants.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The court has discretion to add a person whose presence is necessary to enable it effectually and completely adjudicate on all questions in the suit, but a proposed party whose claim arises from a private agreement to which the defendants were not party, and who shows no documents in its own name, is not a necessary party.
  • Orders will not be set aside on allegations of fraud unless sufficiently proved and supported by new and important matter or evidence.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated 5th June 2020 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the 2nd defendant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A, 63
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 10
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 8 Rule 3
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 51

Cases cited (1)

  • Etore John Akaran & 5 Others -v- Ellen Properties & 4 Others
    ELC Case No. 165 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 63 of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 1 Rule 10, Order 8 Rule 3 and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mzee Adama Makinja & 2 others v Livingstone Ndungu Waithaka & 5 others [2021] KEELC 3888 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/3888/eng@2021-03-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.