Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2021] KEELC 3795 (KLR)

Republic v National Irrigation Board & another Ex parte Peter Muriithi Muriuki [2021] KEELC 3795 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
12 March 2021
2,490 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya confirmed that Kenya's six-month deadline for quashing decisions through certiorari is strict and cannot be extended.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By an Ex-parte Chamber Summons dated 7th September 2020, the Ex-parte Applicant sought leave to apply for an order of certiorari to quash the 1st Respondent's arbitral award in Section H3 delivered on 1st February 2019, conceding that more than six months had lapsed since the award but attributing the delay to the 1st Respondent's failure to provide it. The 2nd Respondents raised a preliminary objection that leave could not be granted under Section 9 of the Law Reform Act and Order 53 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The 2nd Respondents relied on pre-2010 authorities holding that the six-month limit could not be extended; the Applicant cited Article 47(1), 50(1) and 159(2)(d) of the Constitution and the decision in Republic v Kenya Revenue Authority Ex-Parte Stanley Mombo Amuti, urging a more lenient post-2010 approach, and countered that the Respondents' authorities were pre-2010. The 2nd Respondents replied with post-2010 decisions maintaining strict observance of the timelines. The court framed one issue: whether leave for certiorari could be granted after the six-month statutory period. Holding that Section 9(3) and Order 53 Rule 2 are couched in mandatory terms and that post-2010 courts continue to uphold them, and that Article 159(2) is not a magic wand to waive rules of procedure, the court found itself disabled from granting the extension, dismissed the Chamber Summons with each party bearing her own costs, on 12th March 2021 at Kerugoya (E.C. Cherono, ELC Judge).

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the six-month limitation for seeking leave to apply for certiorari under Section 9(3) of the Law Reform Act can be overridden by constitutional provisions, chiefly Article 159(2)

Holding

No. The timelines are mandatory and the court is disabled from granting leave out of time, even post-2010 Constitution.

Reasoning

The court traced the plain and mandatory wording of Section 9(3) of the Law Reform Act and Order 53 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, and reviewed post-2010 authorities which continue to uphold those timelines. Relying on binding Court of Appeal decisions, including Salat and Sabiha Kassamia, the court held that Article 159(2) and the oxygen principles were never meant to overthrow rules of procedure, and that the applicant's reliance on Amuti was doubtful given Mativo J's later emphatic decision in Sabiha Kassamia.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Upon the lapse of six months from the date of the judgment, order, decree, conviction or other proceeding, the court is disabled from granting leave to apply for an order of certiorari, and this limitation remains mandatory post-2010 Constitution notwithstanding Article 159(2)
  • Article 159(2) of the Constitution and the overriding objective are not a magic wand to waive rules and procedures set out in law

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Ex-parte Chamber Summons application dated 7th September 2020 is dismissed
  2. 2.Each party to bear her own costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act (Cap 26) and Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (judicial review)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v National Irrigation Board & another Ex parte Peter Muriithi Muriuki [2021] KEELC 3795 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/3795/eng@2021-03-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.