Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2021] KEELC 2847 (KLR)

Joel Kiptanui Chemweno v Joseph K. M. Tireito [2021] KEELC 2847 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
2 June 2021
2,165 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Both sides lost: the court refused to enforce the land transfer and refused a stay because both appeals were filed too late.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Eldoret (M. A. Odeny, J) dealt with two applications arising from the court's judgment of 23 April 2020 over land parcel LR No. 779/359, in which the plaintiff was decreed a transfer of 2 acres. First, by motion dated 16 September 2020 the plaintiff, invoking Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Charles Mukoma Kimaru case, sought an order that the Deputy Registrar execute the transfer instruments because the defendant refused to sign. The court dismissed this motion, holding it an abuse of process since the plaintiff himself had appealed against the judgment and had a pending Court of Appeal application for extension of time to lodge a notice of appeal, whose status was not disclosed. Second, by motion dated 5 November 2020 the defendant sought stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, submitting he risked giving out 2 acres twice (also to Elijah Sumbeiywo), would suffer irreparable harm, and the appeal would be rendered nugatory. Plaintiff's counsel opposed, showing the defendant failed on substantial loss, sufficient cause, delay and security, citing multiple Court of Appeal authorities. The court framed the issue as whether the defendant met the Order 42 Rule 6 threshold, but first asked what was being stayed pending what. Finding that the plaintiff's notice of appeal (filed 26 days after judgment) and the defendant's notice of cross-appeal (27 days) were both filed outside the statutory 14 days with no extension of time granted, the court held there was technically no valid appeal on which stay could be anchored. Both applications were dismissed with each party bearing their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Execution of decree via Deputy Registrar under Section 98 Civil Procedure Act

Holding

Application dismissed as an abuse of process because the plaintiff has cross-appealed the very judgment he seeks to execute

Reasoning

The court noted both parties were aggrieved by the judgment and had appealed. The plaintiff sought execution of the decree while simultaneously pursuing an application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal, without disclosing its status. The court held execution in these circumstances was an abuse of process and dismissed the motion.

p. 1
02

Threshold for stay of execution under Order 42 Rule 6

Holding

Stay refused; the defendant failed to demonstrate substantial loss, sufficient cause or an offer of security, and there was no valid appeal to anchor the stay

Reasoning

The court held that stay of execution presupposes a valid appeal. Both the notice of appeal (filed 26 days after judgment) and the notice of cross-appeal (27 days) were filed outside the statutory 14 days, and no extension of time had been shown to have been granted. Courts do not give orders in vain, so stay could not issue.

p. 3
03

Whether a valid appeal exists for stay purposes

Holding

No - notices filed out of time and no extension of time granted, so both applications lack merit

Reasoning

The court found that counsel failed to appraise the court on the fate of the application for extension of time to file the notice of appeal out of time. Since both notices were filed outside the statutory period and no extension was shown, there was technically no valid appeal, and both applications were dismissed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Courts will not make orders in aid of an appeal whose status has not been established; a party seeking to execute a judgment it has appealed against abuses court process.
  • A stay of execution pending appeal cannot be anchored on a notice of appeal filed outside the statutory 14-day period where no extension of time has been granted.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The plaintiff's notice of motion dated 16th September 2020 seeking execution of transfer instruments by the Deputy Registrar is dismissed
  2. 2.The defendant's notice of motion dated 5th November 2020 seeking stay of execution is dismissed
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 98
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6

Cases cited (9)

  • Charles Mukoma Kimaru v Johnstone Muchomba Kaguya
    (2020) eKLR
  • Reliance Bank v Norlake Investment Ltd
    (2002) 1 EA 227
  • Carter & Sons Limited v Deposit Protection Board & 2 Others
    Nairobi Civil Appeal no. 291 of 1997
  • Charles Wahome Gethi v Angela Wairimu Gethi
    Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. Nairobi 302 of 2007 UR 205/2007
  • Rashid K Too v Fred I. Imbatu
    (2019) eKLR
  • Ishmael Kanyunyi Thande v Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited
  • Jaber Mohsen Ali & Another v Priscilla Boit & Another
    (2014) eKLR
  • Wycliffe Sikuku Walusaka v Philip Kaita Wekesa
    (2020) eKLR
  • Bildad Simiyu Khakina & 2 Others v Dr. Henry Kerre Wakhungu & 2 Others
    (2020) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules (motions arising from the court's own judgment of 23/4/2020)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joel Kiptanui Chemweno v Joseph K. M. Tireito [2021] KEELC 2847 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/2847/eng@2021-06-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.