Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 3/3/2021 in ELC Suit (ELC Case No. not stated in judgment)· [2021] KEELC 2616 (KLR)

Lois Holdings Limited v Ndiwa Tamboi & 184 others; Co-operative Society (Proposed 2nd Defendant) [2021] KEELC 2616 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
14 July 2021
5,788 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~23 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to reopen a 2014 land judgment because the company ignored a newspaper notice inviting it to join the case, and its land sale contract was void without land control board consent.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, a body corporate whose members had occupied LR No. 6416/6 since the 1980s under a sale agreement dated 24/2/1997, sought by Notice of Motion dated 3/3/2021 to set aside the judgment of Hon. Justice E. Obaga delivered on 29/9/2014 and to be enjoined as proposed 2nd defendant, after being served with an eviction notice in February 2021. It claimed it was never served or made party to the suit. The plaintiff opposed, contending that leave for substituted service by press advertisement was granted on 8/3/2006, that the applicant never paid the purchase price beyond a Kshs 400,000 deposit, that no land control board consent was obtained rendering the agreement void, and that the application was brought after an inordinate six-and-a-half-year delay. The court framed three sub-issues: opportunity to be enjoined, existence of a triable defence, and delay. It held that the press advertisement listing the parcel and inviting all occupants claiming an interest to be joined constituted valid substituted service, so the applicant was deemed served and was the author of its own misfortune in failing to seek joinder. On the defence, the admitted non-payment and absence of land control board consent rendered the agreement void under section 6 of the Land Control Act, defeating specific performance and leaving no triable issue; the absence of a notice of default could not cure the want of consent. The delay was found inordinate and unexplained. The application was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff, and joinder was refused as futile in the face of the undisturbed judgment. Mwangi Njoroge J delivered the judgment at Kitale on 14 July 2021.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant was denied a fair hearing by not being enjoined before judgment

Holding

No - the press advertisement effected valid substituted service on all persons in occupation, giving the applicant the opportunity to apply to be enjoined, which it failed to take

Reasoning

The 8/3/2006 order directed notice by press advertisement and handbills. The advertisement named the parcels occupied by the applicant's members and invited all claimants to be made parties. Occupation of suit land constitutes an interest; members were therefore interested parties under notice, and ignoring the notice rendered them the authors of their own misfortune.

p. 4
02

Whether the applicant has a defence raising triable issues

Holding

No - the admitted absence of land control board consent rendered the agreement void, defeating specific performance and any triable defence

Reasoning

Both parties admitted only a Kshs 400,000 deposit was paid, and no land control board consent was obtained within six months. Under section 6 of the Land Control Act the agreement became void; a void contract cannot support specific performance. Lack of notice of default did not cure the want of consent.

p. 6
03

Whether the application was brought without undue delay

Holding

No - the six-and-a-half-year delay since the 2014 judgment was inordinate and unexplained

Reasoning

The applicant's only explanation was non-service, which failed given the substituted service. The court found the delay lengthy and inordinate and observed that a defaulting purchaser in occupation for 24 years without paying would necessarily be anxious about pending litigation, undermining the claim of ignorance of the suit.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A person served by press advertisement inviting persons claiming an interest in suit land to be enjoined is deemed effectively served and cannot later complain of non-joinder
  • A joinder application by a non-party to a concluded suit is only competent when sought alongside an application to set aside the judgment; if setting aside fails, joinder falls with it
  • A land sale transaction in an agricultural land control area without land control board consent within six months becomes void and cannot ground specific performance or a triable defence

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 3/3/2021 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the plaintiff

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 50, 159
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6; Order 45 Rules 1, 2 and 3; Order 1 Rule 10(2); Order 1 Rule 8; Order 10 Rule 11
  • Land Control ActSections 6 and 22
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 6(1)(e)
  • Indian Transfer of Property Act, 1882Not specified (lis pendens)
  • LSK Conditions of Sale (1989 Edition)Condition 6

Cases cited (20)

  • Elisha Kare Busienei & 3 Others vs Japheth Kipyego Chepkwony & 2 Others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Shah v Mbogo & Another
    [1967] E.A.
  • Stephen Wanyee Roki v K-Rep Bank Limited & 2 Others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Patel v E.A. Cargo Handling Services Limited
    (1974) E.A. 75 / [1975] EA 75
  • James Kanyita Nderitu V Maries Philotas Ghika & Another
    [2016] eKLR, CA No. 6 of 2015
  • Chemwolo & Another V Kubende
    [1986] KLR 492
  • CMC Holdings Vs Nzioki
    [2004] 1 KLR 173
  • Onyango Oloo V Attorney General
    [1986 - 1989] EA 456
  • Sangram Singh V Election Tribunal, Kotch
    AIR 1955 SC 664
  • Carol Silcock v Kassim Sharrif Mohamed
    [2013] eKLR
  • Boaz Kipchumba Kaino v G.H. Tanna & Sons Ltd, Abdu Mukhwana & 3 Others (Interested Parties)
    [2019] eKLR
  • J M K -vs- M W M & Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Flora Cherono v Mary Njihia & 7 Others; Daniel Nyaga Munyambo & 7 Others (Applicants)
    [2021] eKLR
  • Gulf Fabricators v County Government of Siaya
    [2020] eKLR
  • Philip Kiptoo Chemwolo & Mumias Sugar Co. Ltd Vs Augustine Kubende
    (1982-1988) KAR 1036
  • Evans V Bartam
    [1993] AC 473
  • Ayub Ndungu V Marion Waithera Gacheru
    Civil Case No. 1496 of 2002
  • Njamumu Vs Nyaga
    [1983] KLR 282
  • Reliable Electrical Engineers Ltd Vs Mantrac Kenya Ltd
    2006 eKLR
  • Mohamed Shally Sese V Fulson Company Limited & Another
    [2006] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent discretion under Article 159 of the Constitution and Order 42 Rule 6, Order 45 Rules 1, 2 and 3 and Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Lois Holdings Limited v Ndiwa Tamboi & 184 others; Co-operative Society (Proposed 2nd Defendant) [2021] KEELC 2616 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Notice of Motion dated 3/3/2021 in ELC Suit (ELC Case No. not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/2616/eng@2021-07-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.