Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially Allowed· [2021] KEELC 2472 (KLR)

Alice Wanjiku Njoroge & another v Susan Wambui Kabuu & 3 others [2021] KEELC 2472 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 July 2021
3,707 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiffs sued for rectification of the register in respect of LR No. Lake Kenyatta/2786 (correctly LR No. Lamu/Lake Kenyatta 1/2786), contending they were the first to gather and clear the land and were erroneously omitted at adjudication, while the 1st Defendant, who already held title to LR No. Lake Kenyatta 1/1145, was wrongly issued title to the suit property. The 1st Defendant denied the claim, asserting she was the original occupant, that the Plaintiffs encroached during her illness, and counterclaimed for removal of a restriction and eviction of the Plaintiffs. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants, represented by the Attorney General, filed no response. The court applied Section 80 of the Land Registration Act, which permits rectification where a registration was obtained by fraud or mistake. It found the 1st Defendant's title, issued on 28th August 2006, was a product of mistake or fraud: she had neither responded to the 1997 Letter of Offer nor paid any monies before the title issued, and the land remained charged to the Settlement Fund Trustees. Her testimony contained material contradictions, including claims about payment of fees described as complete fabrication, and inconsistent assertions regarding ownership of Plot 1145. The court found the Plaintiffs had proved their case on a balance of probabilities, dismissed the Counterclaim as riddled with falsehoods and half-truths, and allowed the Plaintiffs' suit as prayed, awarding them costs of both the suit and the Counterclaim.

Key legal issues

#
01

Rectification of register for fraud or mistake

Holding

The title issued to the 1st Defendant on 28th August 2006 was a product of mistake or fraud, warranting rectification

Reasoning

The 1st Defendant never responded to the 1997 Letter of Offer nor paid any monies before the title issued. The land remained charged to the Settlement Fund Trustees with no discharge of charge. Her 2013 payment for discharge of charge was refused and refunded because the plot had been allocated to the Plaintiffs. Her claim to have paid fees when collecting the title was a fabrication.

p. 5
02

Plaintiffs' proof of their case

Holding

Plaintiffs proved their case on a balance of probabilities

Reasoning

Evidence showed the Plaintiffs gathered, cleared, cultivated and developed the suit property, and were later allocated it by the Settlement office, which rejected the 1st Defendant's payment for discharge of charge. The 1st Defendant was found on Plot 1145 by the task force, not the suit property, undermining her claim of original occupation.

p. 5
03

1st Defendant's credibility

Holding

The 1st Defendant's account contained contradictions and falsehoods

Reasoning

She asserted Plot 1145 belonged to her brother yet admitted in her statement requesting registration in her own name; she claimed to have paid fees before title issuance, yet the only recorded payment was after the title issued. Her claim of continuous occupation was contradicted by her own counterclaim seeking the Plaintiffs' eviction.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A court may order rectification of the register where a registration was obtained, made or omitted by fraud or mistake, subject to protection of a proprietor in possession for value without knowledge of the fraud or mistake

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Order of rectification of the register and registration of the Plaintiffs as proprietors of LR No. Lake Kenyatta/2786 as prayed in the Plaint
  2. 2.Dismissal of the 1st Defendant's Counterclaim
  3. 3.Plaintiffs awarded costs of both the suit and the Counterclaim

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration ActSection 80(1) and (2)
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction under the Land Registration Act and Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Alice Wanjiku Njoroge & another v Susan Wambui Kabuu & 3 others [2021] KEELC 2472 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/2472/eng@2021-07-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.